Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Do complement clauses with first- or third-person perspective support false-belief reasoning? A training study with English-speaking 3-year-olds

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9787384
AutoresDitte Boeg Thomsen (0000-0001-7387-0443, University of Copenhagen, autor de correspondencia), Birsu Kandemirci (0000-0002-9422-0279), A L Theakston (0000-0002-9483-7893), Silke Brandt (0000-0003-3363-8740, Lancaster University)
Año2025
Volumen61
Número6
Páginas1044-1062
Fecha de publicación2025-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaDevelopmental Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0012-1649 • E-ISSN: 1939-0599
EditorialAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/dev0001808
PMID39418474
OpenAlexW4403509498
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1

To investigate whether acquisition of the perspective-marking grammar of complement-clause constructions supports progression in children's false-belief reasoning, we conducted a training study with 76 English-speaking 3-year-olds from the North-West of England (age range: 3;0-3;10 years, 50% female, 80% White). Children were randomly assigned to one of three maximally comparable training conditions, and in a 4-week eight-session program, all children participated in the same training activities with mental-state contrasts. Depending on condition, activities were mediated linguistically with either simple clauses, first-person complements, or third-person complements. The study addressed critical confounds in previous training studies by avoiding the use of complement clauses in false-belief tests and controlling individual differences in memory, executive functioning, general language, and pretest proficiency with complement clauses. The results yielded strong support for the hypothesis of a causal influence of complement-clause exposure on false-belief progression, as children trained with first-person complements advanced significantly more in false-belief reasoning from pretest to posttest than children trained with simple clauses. Examining the roles of first- and third-person complements, a direct comparison between progression in the two complement-clause conditions showed no significant difference, but only children trained with first-person complements progressed significantly more than children in the control condition trained with simple clauses. Follow-up analyses suggested that first- and third-person complements each support false-belief progression at different stages of development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)

Cognitive psychology · Complement (music · Developmental psychology · Perspective (graphical · Perspective-taking · Training (meteorology · Artificial Intelligence · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Psychology · Social Psychology · Speech and dialogue systems

  • Theory of mind

    Open Access•Jill De Villiers, Stephanie Durrleman•Child Language Teaching and Therapy•2026

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae