Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The developmental trajectory of intramaze and extramaze landmark biases in spatial navigation

An unexpected journey

Bibliographic Data

ID9787702
AuthorsMatthew G Buckley (0000-0002-6879-9408, University of Nottingham, corresponding author), Mark Haselgrove (0000-0001-8981-1181, University of Nottingham), Alastair D Smith (0000-0002-7335-4083, University of Nottingham)
Year2015
Volume51
Issue6
Pages771-791
Publication date2015-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDevelopmental Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0012-1649 • E-ISSN: 1939-0599
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/a0039054
PMID25844850
PMCIDPMC4445389
OpenAlexW2327350377
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited7

Adults learning to navigate to a hidden goal within an enclosed space have been found to prefer information provided by the distal cues of an environment, as opposed to proximal landmarks within the environment. Studies with children, however, have shown that 5- or 7-year-olds do not display any preference toward distal or proximal cues during navigation. This suggests that a bias toward learning about distal cues occurs somewhere between the age of 7 years and adulthood. We recruited 5- to 11-year-old children and an adult sample to explore the developmental profile of this putative change. Across a series of 3 experiments, participants were required to navigate to a hidden goal in a virtual environment, the location of which was signaled by both extramaze and intramaze landmark cues. During testing, these cues were placed into conflict to assess the search preferences of participants. Consistent with previously reported findings, adults were biased toward using extramaze information. However, analysis of the data from children, which incorporated age as a continuous variable, suggested that older children in our sample were, in fact, biased toward using the intramaze landmark in our task. These findings suggest the bias toward using distal cues in spatial navigation, frequently displayed by adults, may be a comparatively late developing trait, and one that could supersede an initial developmental preference for proximal landmarks

Cartography · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Geography · Landmark · Preference · Sensory cue · Task (project management · Trait · Child and Animal Learning Development · Memory and Neural Mechanisms · Psychology · Spatial Cognition and Navigation

  • Virtual Reality and Spatial Cognition

    Open Access•Alastair D Smith•Science & Education•2025

  • Children five-to-nine years old can use path integration to build a cognitive map without vision

    Open Access•Mathilde Bostelmann, Pierre Lavenex et al.•Cognitive Psychology•2020

  • Relative cue precision and prior knowledge contribute to the preference of proximal and distal landmarks in human orientation

    Open Access•Yafei Qi, Weimin Mou•Cognition•2024

  • A theory of attention

    N J Mackintosh•Psychological Review•1975

  • A model for Pavlovian learning

    John M Pearce, Geoffrey Hall•Psychological Review•1980

  • Development of the adolescent brain

    Open Access•Sarah‐jayne Blakemore, Suparna Choudhury•Journal of Child Psychology and…•2006

  • On Using Analysis Of Covariance In Repeated Measures Designs

    Harold D Delaney, Scott E Maxwell•Multivariate Behavioral Research•1981

  • Navigational place learning in children and young adults as assessed with a standardized locomotor search task

    Open Access•Bernd Leplow, Maria Lehnung et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2003

  • Development of spatial memory and spatial orientation in preschoolers and primary school children

    Open Access•Maria Lehnung, Bernd Leplow et al.•British Journal of Psychology•1998

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0.5
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae