Developmental changes in young children’s willingness to copy the antisocial actions of ingroup members in a minimal group context
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9788013 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matti Wilks (0000-0003-3814-3763, Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, corresponding author), James N Kirby (0000-0002-0703-1534, Altran (France)), James Kirby (0000-0003-1839-5883), Mark Nielsen (0000-0002-0402-8372, Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 709-721 |
| Publication date | 2019-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Developmental Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-1649 • E-ISSN: 1939-0599 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/dev0000667 |
| PMID | 30570299 |
| OpenAlex | W2906240288 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 15 |
Children hold strong ingroup biases from a young age, liking ingroup over outgroup members and preferring them as social learning models. Simultaneously, children are also highly prosocial-both in their own helping behaviors and their avoidance of those who behave antisocially. This study explores how children of 2 age groups (4-5 and 7-8 years) react when these biases conflict; that is, when children's ingroup behaves antisocially. Children were assigned to a group and given a premeasure of liking to assess ingroup bias. They were then shown videos of the ingroup behaving antisocially and the outgroup behaving prosocially (or neutral controls). Children were then given the opportunity to choose which group to imitate and whether they wanted to change groups and then again given a measure of liking. Results revealed that older children were highly sensitive to pro- and antisocial behavior; when their ingroup was antisocial they were less likely to imitate them, reported liking them less, and were more likely to want to change groups. In contrast, younger children imitated the ingroup and reported liking them more regardless of their behavior and actually reported wanting to change groups less when their group was antisocial. This demonstrates a clear developmental jump between younger and older children in their capacity to weigh multiple strands of information when making decisions, and in particular it highlights the emergence of strong prosocial concern that persists over a drive to affiliate with an ingroup. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)
Context (archaeology · Developmental psychology · In-group favoritism · Ingroups and outgroups · Outgroup · Prosocial behavior · PsycINFO · Social group · Social identity theory · Child and Animal Learning Development · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
Does Distance Matter? How Physical and Social Distance Shape Our Perceived Obligations to Others
The preference and development for societal-type cues in 3- to 8-year-olds' perception of groups
Parallel paths and developmental Divides
The effect of different types of social norms on children's sharing behavior
I Should but I Won’t
Children’s selective trust in native-accented speakers
The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology
How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others
Imitation and Innovation
The accidental transgressor
The hidden structure of overimitation
Costly third-party punishment in young children
Why Culture Is Common, but Cultural Evolution Is Rare
The evolution of cultural evolution
A Developmental Science Approach to Reducing Prejudice and Social Exclusion
Copying actions and copying outcomes
Selective social learning
Children’s recognition of fairness and others’ welfare in a resource allocation task
The developmental foundations of human fairness
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |