Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Developmental changes in young children’s willingness to copy the antisocial actions of ingroup members in a minimal group context

Bibliographic Data

ID9788013
AuthorsMatti Wilks (0000-0003-3814-3763, Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, corresponding author), James N Kirby (0000-0002-0703-1534, Altran (France)), James Kirby (0000-0003-1839-5883), Mark Nielsen (0000-0002-0402-8372, Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod)
Year2019
Volume55
Issue4
Pages709-721
Publication date2019-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDevelopmental Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0012-1649 • E-ISSN: 1939-0599
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/dev0000667
PMID30570299
OpenAlexW2906240288
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited15

Children hold strong ingroup biases from a young age, liking ingroup over outgroup members and preferring them as social learning models. Simultaneously, children are also highly prosocial-both in their own helping behaviors and their avoidance of those who behave antisocially. This study explores how children of 2 age groups (4-5 and 7-8 years) react when these biases conflict; that is, when children's ingroup behaves antisocially. Children were assigned to a group and given a premeasure of liking to assess ingroup bias. They were then shown videos of the ingroup behaving antisocially and the outgroup behaving prosocially (or neutral controls). Children were then given the opportunity to choose which group to imitate and whether they wanted to change groups and then again given a measure of liking. Results revealed that older children were highly sensitive to pro- and antisocial behavior; when their ingroup was antisocial they were less likely to imitate them, reported liking them less, and were more likely to want to change groups. In contrast, younger children imitated the ingroup and reported liking them more regardless of their behavior and actually reported wanting to change groups less when their group was antisocial. This demonstrates a clear developmental jump between younger and older children in their capacity to weigh multiple strands of information when making decisions, and in particular it highlights the emergence of strong prosocial concern that persists over a drive to affiliate with an ingroup. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)

Context (archaeology · Developmental psychology · In-group favoritism · Ingroups and outgroups · Outgroup · Prosocial behavior · PsycINFO · Social group · Social identity theory · Child and Animal Learning Development · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Does Distance Matter? How Physical and Social Distance Shape Our Perceived Obligations to Others

    Open Access•Julia Marshall, Matti Wilks•Open MIND•2024

  • The preference and development for societal-type cues in 3- to 8-year-olds' perception of groups

    Yang Wang, Fangfang Wen et al.•Acta Psychologica Sinica•2023

  • Parallel paths and developmental Divides

    Open Access•Courtney C Baugh, Molly A Schlesinger et al.•Developmental Review•2026

  • The effect of different types of social norms on children's sharing behavior

    Open Access•Bingying Wei, Xuran Zhang et al.•Social Development•2023

  • I Should but I Won’t

    Open Access•Craig E Smith, Peter Blake et al.•PLoS ONE•2013

  • Children’s selective trust in native-accented speakers

    Open Access•Katherine D Kinzler, Kathleen H Corriveau et al.•Developmental Science•2011

  • The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology

    Open Access•Mark Nielsen, Daniel Benjamin Moritz Haun et al.•Journal of Experimental Child…•2017

  • How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others

    Open Access•J Kiley Hamlin, Karen Wynn et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2011

  • Imitation and Innovation

    Open Access•Cristine H Legare, Mark Nielsen•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2015

  • The accidental transgressor

    Open Access•Melanie Killen, Kelly Lynn Mulvey et al.•Cognition•2011

  • The hidden structure of overimitation

    Open Access•Derek E Lyons, Andrew G Young et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2007

  • Costly third-party punishment in young children

    Open Access•Katherine Mcauliffe, Jillian J Jordan et al.•Cognition•2015

  • Why Culture Is Common, but Cultural Evolution Is Rare

    Robert Boyd, Peter J Richerson•The Origin and Evolution of…•2005

  • The evolution of cultural evolution

    Open Access•J Henrich, Richard Mcelreath•Evolutionary Anthropology Issues…•2003

  • A Developmental Science Approach to Reducing Prejudice and Social Exclusion

    Open Access•Adam Rutland, Melanie Killen•Social Issues and Policy Review•2015

  • Copying actions and copying outcomes

    Mark Nielsen•Developmental Psychology•2006

  • Selective social learning

    M A Koenig, Mark A Sabbagh•Developmental Psychology•2013

  • Children’s recognition of fairness and others’ welfare in a resource allocation task

    Open Access•Michael T Rizzo, Laura Elenbaas et al.•Developmental Psychology•2016

  • The developmental foundations of human fairness

    Open Access•Katherine Mcauliffe, Peter Blake et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2017

Unique citing works4
Citations per year1,33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae