Friends’ discussions of interpersonal and noninterpersonal problems during early and middle adolescence
Associations with co-rumination
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9795243 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amanda J Rose (0000-0001-8681-6155, University of Missouri, corresponding author), Rhiannon L Smith (University of Connecticut), Rebecca A Schwartz‐Mette (0000-0002-6708-0389, University of Maine), Gary C Glick (0000-0001-7265-7421, Marist College) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 2350-2357 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Developmental Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-1649 • E-ISSN: 1939-0599 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/dev0001445 |
| OpenAlex | W4294126887 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 11 |
Friendships are important sources of support during adolescence. However, a growing literature indicates some adolescents co-ruminate, or talk with friends about problems in a way that is excessive, speculative, and negatively focused, which confers risk for internalizing problems. Still, previous research had not examined the types of problems co-ruminators discuss. Using self-reported co-rumination and observations of friends’ conversation about problems, the present study of early and middle adolescents addressed this gap. Participants (N = 628) were approximately half female (52%of the sample) and primarly European American and African American (63% and 29% of the sample respectively). Adolescents who reported greater co-rumination spent more time discussing interpersonal problems with friends, including problems with families, peers, and romantic interests. Interpersonal problems may lend themselves to co-rumination because they can be ambiguous, multifaceted, and difficult to resolve. In contrast, co-rumination was not related spending more time discussing non-interpersonal problems. In addition, middle adolescents were observed to spend more time than early adolescents discussing problems related to developmentally salient tasks (e.g., romantic relationships, academics), and girls spent more time than boys discussing interpersonal problems. Taken together, the findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of a co-rumination. Moreover, the study has applied implications in that findings suggest that adolescents experiencing interpersonal problems may be elevated risk of co-ruminating. In addition to steering these adolescents away from co-rumination, fostering better problem-solving skills for interpersonal problems may lead to the resolution of these problems before they become topics of co-rumination
Cognition · Developmental psychology · Interpersonal communication · Interpersonal relationship · Rumination · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research · Psychology · Social Psychology · Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
Sex Differences in Adolescent Depression
Co–Rumination in the Friendships of Girls and Boys
Age and Gender as Determinants of Stress Exposure, Generation, and Reactions in Youngsters
A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes
Talking Together, Thinking Alone
Prospective associations of co-rumination with friendship and emotional adjustment
Parent relationship quality buffers against the effect of peer stressors on depressive symptoms from middle childhood to adolescence
Developmental changes in gender composition of friendship networks in adolescent girls and boys
An observational study of co-rumination in adolescent friendships
Goals as a mediator of gender differences in high-affiliation dyadic conversations
Adolescent Development in Interpersonal and Societal Contexts
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |