Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Boys withdraw more in one-on-one interactions, whereas girls withdraw more in groups

Bibliographic Data

ID9795462
AuthorsJoyce F Benenson (0000-0001-6870-6016, University of Plymouth, corresponding author), Anna Heath (0000-0002-7263-4251, University of Plymouth)
Year2006
Volume42
Issue2
Pages272-282
Publication date2006-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDevelopmental Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0012-1649 • E-ISSN: 1939-0599
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.272
PMID16569166
OpenAlexW2164221445
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited26

Past research predicts that males will be more likely to withdraw in one-on-one interactions versus groups, whereas females will be more likely to withdraw in groups than in one-on-one interactions. Ninety-eight 10-year-old children engaged in a word generation task either in same-sex dyads or in groups. Boys completed significantly more words in groups than in dyads, whereas girls' performance was similar in the 2 social structures. Confirming the hypothesis, analyses of the dynamics of dyads and groups using time spent writing as a measure of effort demonstrated that boys withdrew more than girls in dyads, whereas girls withdrew more than boys in groups. Furthermore, in groups, girls were more likely than boys to focus on one individual. Causal explanations for sex differences in preferences for differing social structures are proposed

Developmental psychology · Group dynamic · Social relation · Child and Animal Learning Development · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Gender Variations in Linguistic Styles Across Online Platforms

    Open Access•Omer Elsheikh Hago Elmahdi Omer Elsheikh Hago Elmahdi, Omer Elsheikh Hago…•International Journal of…•2024

  • Sex (similarities and) differences in friendship jealousy

    Open Access•Jaimie Arona Krems, Keelah E G Williams et al.•Evolution and Human Behavior•2022

  • Two’s Company, Three’s a Crowd

    Marina Puzakova, Hyokjin Kwak•Journal of Advertising•2023

  • Manufacturing Phenomena or Preserving Phenomena? Core Issues in the Identification of Peer Social Groups With Social Cognitive Mapping Procedures

    Open Access•Thomas W Farmer, Hongling Xie•Social Development•2012

  • Social Networks Derived from Affiliations and Friendships, Multi‐informant and Self‐reports

    Open Access•Philip C Rodkin, Hai‐Jeong Ahn•Social Development•2009

  • Female Reproductive Strategies and Competition in Apes

    Open Access•M E Thompson, Rebecca M Stumpf et al.•International Journal of…•2008

  • Human Sexual Differences in the Use of Social Ostracism as a Competitive Tactic

    Open Access•Joyce F Benenson, Lindsay Hodgson et al.•International Journal of…•2008

  • Relational victimization predicts children’s social-cognitive and self-regulatory responses in a challenging peer context

    Karen D Rudolph, Wendy Troop-Gordon et al.•Developmental Psychology•2009

  • Men and Women in Interaction

    Elizabeth Aries•Men and women in interaction•1996

  • Patterns and functions of self-disclosure during childhood and adolescence

    Open Access•Duane Buhrmester, Karen J Prager et al.•Disclosure Processes in Children…•1995

  • Staying alive

    Open Access•Anne Campbell•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1999

  • An Ecological Model of Female-Bonded Primate Groups

    R W Wrangham•Behaviour•1980

  • Young Children's Play Qualities in Same-, Other-, and Mixed-Sex Peer Groups

    Open Access•Richard A Fabes, Charles L Martins et al.•Child Development•2003

  • Adolescence

    Alice Schlegel, Herbert Barry•Choice Reviews Online•1991

  • Peacemaking among Primates

    Frans Β Μ De Waal, Frans B M De Waal•Peacemaking among Primates•1989

  • The Effect of Gender Context on Children's Social Behavior in a Limited Resource Situation

    Open Access•Vanessa A Green, Antonius H N Cillessen et al.•Social Development•2003

  • Circle of Friends or Members of a Group? Sex Differences in Relational and Collective Attachment to Groups

    Open Access•Elizabeth A Seeley, Wendi L Gardner et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2003

  • Contrasting Correlates of Group Size

    Philip E Slater•Sociometry•1958

  • Sex and contextual effects on children's use of interference competition

    Rosanne Roy, Joyce F Benenson•Developmental Psychology•2002

  • Marital processes predictive of later dissolution

    John M Gottman, Robert W Levenson•Journal of Personality and Social…•1992

  • Are there "his" and "hers" types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition

    Shira Gabriel, Wendi L Gardner•Journal of Personality and Social…•1999

  • Evolution of coalitionary killing

    Open Access•R W Wrangham•American Journal of Physical…•1999

  • What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness

    Roy F Baumeister, Kristin L Sommer•Psychological Bulletin•1997

  • Sexuality and Gender in Children's Daily Worlds

    Barrie Thorne, Zella Luria•Social Problems•1986

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0,44
Citation span2008 - 2024 (17)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae