Quo Warranto and Borough Corporations in Early Stuart England

Quo Warranto proceedings have long been interpreted as one of the means by which the English crown attempted to enforce its will on local people. The later Stuarts used this tool to redraw borough constitutions, as even the charter of the city of London came into question under the pressure of quo warranto. This article takes a close look at the use of this prerogative writ in the early seventeenth century in reference to incorporated boroughs, and reveals a more complicated story of relations between crown and local government. It argues that quo warranto resulted in many instances not from the intentions of the crown to curb local franchises, but rather from internal struggles in a locality that were brought to the attention of the central courts by local people. While many towns encountered quo warranto proceedings at some point in the early seventeenth century, very few suffered any significant loss of privileges as a result. At the same time, the crown did view quo warranto as one way to gain its own ends vis-à-vis incorporated towns. The 1630s, in particular, saw some cases of quo warranto being used to punish or constrain town governments considered errant. While its legal impact may have been muted, quo warranto had, by the time of the calling of the Long Parliament, become associated with a perception of arbitrary power

Borough · Gentry · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Prerogative · Status quo · Writ · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Historical Economic and Legal Thought · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Law · Public Administration

• How Merchant Towns Shaped Parliaments

  Charles Angelucci, Simone Meraglia et al.•American Economic Review•2022

  Add to list