Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Unpredictability and Presence

Norwegian Kingship in the High Middle Ages

Bibliographic Data

ID9799898
AuthorsDavid Rollason (Durham University, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume124
Issue511
Pages1460-1461
Publication date2009-11-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe English Historical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ehr/cep288
OpenAlexW1983238291
LanguageEN

The strength of this book lies in the way that it locates Norwegian kingship in the context of broader European developments across the whole early and high middle ages, and of theoretical discussions about state formation and the nature of royal power. Its starting-point is the distinction between ‘absolute loyalty’ to the king and ‘contextual loyalty’ to him. By the former, Orning understands an absolute principle of loyalty founded on the king's role as the administrator of law and justice, a principle universally applied to, and accepted by, all his subjects—regardless of whether or not he himself were present among them. By the latter, Orning understands a principle of loyalty which was dependent on the context in which it was invoked, which was a matter of subjects calculating the advantages or disadvantages of espousing it in particular situations, and which therefore depended on the king being present and on the unpredictability and fearfulness of what his actions might be when he was. Orning relates this distinction to the transition from an oral to a literary culture, drawing on studies of modern non-literate societies to suggest that such societies were incapable of absorbing an abstract principle such as that of ‘absolute loyalty’, but their members behaved in ways dependent on the contexts of that behaviour. Abstract principles were only possible with the introduction of literacy, which permitted ideas to assume an existence independent of actions. Orning relates the distinction he has drawn between ‘absolute’ and ‘contextual’ loyalty to what he calls ‘legal anthropological history’, the proponents of which (including Stephen D. White, Gerd Althoff, and Paul Hyams) have engaged in a new ‘discourse about violence’, starting from the anthropologically-inspired view of law as embedded in society rather than an absolute principle, and of conflicts and feuds as means of conflict resolution rather than symptoms of disorder

Absolute (philosophy · Context (archaeology · Economic Justice · Epistemology · Loyalty · Middle Ages · Monarchy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Theology · Historical and Archaeological Studies · Historical Legal Studies and Society · History · Law · Medieval Literature and History · Philosophy

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae