Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Shareholder Democracies? English Stock Companies and the Politics of Corporate Governance during the Industrial Revolution

Bibliographic Data

ID9801836
AuthorsR Pearson (0000-0001-7419-3448)
Year2002
Volume117
Issue473
Pages840-866
Publication date2002-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe English Historical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ehr/117.473.840
OpenAlexW2055168167
LanguageEN
Citations received11

Much remains unknown about the political dimensions of business during the classic period of the British industrial revolution, c.1770‐1850. This article focuses upon one aspect of those politics, namely the internal relations between company directors, managers and shareholders. Its object is to search for ‘shareholder democracy’ in action, through a study of the governance of stock companies in the insurance industry, based upon the surviving records of nearly 50 firms. Before the 1830s this was the leading sector in the economy for the unchartered joint‐stock partnership, one of the most common and problematic forms of stock company organisation in Britain before the railway age. The scale of these enterprises, with their large shareholder base and extensive marketing operations, helped sharpen the principal agent issues which Adam Smith regarded as endemic problems in joint‐stock organisations. The first section of the article examines the scale of joint‐stock enterprise during the first industrial revolution – for its extent and importance have traditionally been questioned – and the legal and institutional context within which it developed. The second section presents evidence from the insurance sample which suggests that the history of ‘participatory shareholder democracy’ remained difficult and contested throughout this period

Business · Corporate governance · Economics · Joint-stock company · Market economy · Political science · Politics · Shareholder · Accounting · Finance · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Law

  • Business in Pictures

    James Taylor•Past & Present•2005

  • Business Networking in the Industrial Revolution

    Open Access•Robin Pearson, David Richardson•The Economic History Review•2001

  • An Incomplete Revolution

    Open Access•Michael Aldous, Stefano Condorelli•Enterprise & Society•2019

  • Internalities and the Foundations of Corporate Governance

    Open Access•Ciarán O’kelly, Sally Wheeler•Social & Legal Studies•2012

  • Corporate Law Versus Social Autonomy

    Open Access•Michael Galanis•Law and Critique•2020

  • Mutual life insurers

    Christopher O'Brien, Christopher O’Brien et al.•Business History•2012

  • Origins resting behind banking financial accountability of paragraphs 78 to 82 of the First Schedule of the Companies Act 1862 (UK)

    Chantal S Game, Lisa M Cullen et al.•Business History•2022

  • A new view of shareholder voting in the nineteenth century

    Mariana Pargendler, Henry Hansmann•Business History•2013

  • Technological change and the governance of joint-stock enterprise in the early nineteenth century

    Mark Freeman, Robin Pearson et al.•Business History•2007

  • Investing in independence

    Open Access•James Christopher Mizes•Africa•2022

  • De la mutualisation solidaire à la gestion actuarielle

    Mathieu Charbonneau, François Pizarro-Noël•Sociologie et sociétés•2020

Unique citing works11
Citations per year0.44
Citation span2001 - 2022 (22)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae