Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Madness in Seventeenth-Century Autobiography

Bibliographic Data

ID9801951
AuthorsAnna Bayman (corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume123
Issue502
Pages739-740
Publication date2008-05-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe English Historical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ehr/cen119
OpenAlexW2161439379
LanguageEN
Citations received2

The seventeenth century has routinely been posited as a time when the histories of madness and religion took important new directions. The upheavals of the period produced new forms of religious enthusiasm that we might well expect to overlap with madness, and they were indeed perceived to be frequent bedfellows. Here, three narratives of madness, written by the recovered sufferers, are unravelled to illustrate the complex and contested ways in which mental disorder was experienced and identified. The three texts, by Dionys Fitzherbert, Hannah Allen, and George Trosse, have much in common. They are all located in the important genre of spiritual autobiography, meaning that their subjects' afflictions are presented as formative religious experiences. They share ways in which they differ from conventional spiritual autobiographies, notably in their attention to social context. Since the interests of accounts of madness and of spiritual autobiographies converge at specific points, especially the subject's relationship with God and understanding of what constitutes (God's) truth, these texts should offer us important perspectives on those points of intersection. There are also significant differences between the texts, and the disparities from each other as well as their shared deviance from conventional godly self-writing are telling. Fitzherbert wrote significantly earlier than the others, in the early seventeenth century when the genre was very young. The later seventeenth-century narratives of the nonconformists Allen and Trosse, written in a very different climate, conformed more closely to a recognised model. Unlike Allen and Trosse, Fitzherbert disputed her diagnosis, insisting that her disorder was spiritual affliction as opposed to melancholy or madness, a distinction not recognised by the later writers. Allen's work embraced the concept of religious melancholy; and Trosse, whose madness was more violent than melancholic, found the relationship between his disorder and his sin to be self-evident

Art · Biography · Context (archaeology · Deviance (statistics · Enthusiasm · Epistemology · Literature · Meaning (existential · Narrative · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Early Modern Women Writers · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · History · Philosophy · Psychology · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity · Social Psychology

  • “Sus mandamientos no son penosos”

    Open Access•Andrés Gattinoni•Anales de Historia Antigua…•2022

  • Comfort Eating

    Open Access•Rachel Winchcombe•The English Historical Review•2023

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2022 - 2023 (2)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae