U.S.-India Tensions
Misperceptions on Nuclear Proliferation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9819372 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Deepa M Ollapally (corresponding author), Deepa Ollapally, Raja Ramanna |
| Year | 1995 |
| Volume | 74 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 13 |
| Publication date | 1995-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Foreign Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0015-7120 • E-ISSN: 2327-7793 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/20047015 |
| OpenAlex | W2590573897 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
Nonproliferation Treaty, that India is vulnerable to technology-denying efforts, and that it can be equated with its neigh bor, Pakistan. These perceptions take on added import because of the assumption by American policymakers that South Asia is the most dangerous nuclear hot spot. Implicitly, India's image also con tinues to be that of a revisionist state des tined to be at odds with the United States, a status quo global power. These are misperceptions that deserve atten tion, as only four months remain for con structive dialogue before the npt conference convenes to review the expir ing 30-year-old treaty. The npt has come to represent the core of U.S. nonproliferation efforts. The Clinton administration has promised to spare no effort to get an indefinite exten sion. The United States sees India's con tinuing opposition to signing what New Delhi considers an inherently discrimina tory npt as symptomatic of India's ten dency to obstruct global arms control efforts. This view, however, discounts India's numerous disarmament initiatives (in the United Nations and elsewhere) and its adherence to the principles that underlie the npt
Development economics · Economics · Nuclear proliferation · Nuclear weapon · Political science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense
Preserving the Unipolar Moment
Invisible weapons, visible choices
India’s Chequered Relationship with the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
Rationalising Narasimha Rao
How can emerging powers speak? On theorists, native informants and quasi-officials in International Relations discourse
Identidade, status e instituições internacionais
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1996 - 2024 (29) |
| Highly cited | No |