Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Bombing of Auschwitz

Should the Allies Have Attempted It

Bibliographic Data

ID9822229
AuthorsEliot A Cohen (corresponding author), Michael J Neufeld, Michael Berenbaum
Year2000
Volume79
Issue6
Pages179
Publication date2000-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueForeign Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0015-7120 • E-ISSN: 2327-7793
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/20049996
OpenAlexW2089270667
LanguageEN
Citations received9

Did we know the gas chambers were there? Could we have destroyed them? Why didn't we bomb? For decades, debate has raged over whether the Allies should have bombed the gas chambers at and the railroads leading to the camp, thereby saving thousands of lives and disrupting Nazi efforts to exterminate European Jews. Was it truly feasible to do so? Did failure to do so simply reflect a callous indifference to the plight of the Jews of was it a realistic assessment of a plan that could not succeed? In this volume, a number of historians address and debate these questions. Published in association with the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, this is designed as a resource for understanding this deeply troubling episode in the 20th century's greatest horror. Prominent scholars such as Sir Martin Gilbert, Walter Laqueur, Michael Berenbaum, Gerhard Weinberg and Williamson Murray offer a diverse array of mutually supporting and competing perspectives on the subject. In the process they shed light on how much knowledge of Allied intelligence actually had and on what measures the Allies might have taken to halt the killing. book is also rich in documentary evidence - including the correspondence of Churchill, Roosevelt, Cordell Hull, Anthony Eden and John McCloy - that reveals just how much these men knew about the situation and what they thought about its potential resolution. It also includes a selection of the most important documents and aerial reconnaissance photographs from 1944 exploring the feasibility of an air strike. Ultimately, these contributions show that the dilemma over was far more complex than criticisms of inaction would suggest. The Bombing of Auschwitz is an unusual volume that confronts life-and-death questions and addresses a matter of enduring interest for all readers of World War II and Holocaust history

Criminology · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Spanish Civil War · Strategic bombing · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · Italian Fascism and Post-war Society · Law · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration

  • Une morale internationale de la mise en accusation

    Ariel Colonomos•L Année sociologique•2004

  • Still Standing By

    Benjamin A Valentino•Perspectives on Politics•2003

  • Worksheet for Describing and Categorizing a Genocidal Event

    Open Access•Israel W Charny•Social Sciences•2016

  • Genocide Studies

    Open Access•Colin Tatz•Genocide Studies and Prevention•2011

  • Unilateral jurisdiction

    Open Access•Ariel Colonomos•Human Rights Review•2004

  • The reassertion of the elusiveness narrative

    Michael Fleming•Holocaust Studies•2020

  • Calculated Indifference

    Danny Orbach, M Solonin•Holocaust and Genocide Studies•2013

  • The U.S. State Department and the Failure to Rescue

    Max Paul Friedman•Holocaust and Genocide Studies•2005

  • An American Operational Response to a Request to Bomb Rail Lines to Auschwitz

    Katie Mahoney, K A Mahoney•Holocaust and Genocide Studies•2011

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,39
Citation span2003 - 2020 (18)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae