We, the Peoples of Europe

Bibliographic Data

ID9830680
AuthorsKaterina Nicolaidis (0000-0002-4596-3148, corresponding author), Kalypso Nicolaïdis
Year2004
Volume83
Issue6
Pages97
Publication date2004-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueForeign Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0015-7120 • E-ISSN: 2327-7793
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/20034140
OpenAlexW158571882
LanguageEN
Citations received35

Political tremors are shaking the old continent. As the European Union’s enlargement brings most of the continent under the same banner, Europeans, like their American cousins two centuries ago, are on the verge of treating themselves to a full-blown constitution. In June, after more than two years of heated debate, eu heads of state settled on the text of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe. The treaty will not enter into force, however, until it is ratified by all 25 member states, through their national parliaments or popular referendums. And a single defection could spell the end of the entire exercise. Was the June meeting Europe’s Philadelphia? The text’s drafters claim that it was. They argue that the constitution will give the eu a more eaective government, better adapted to its greater size and ambitions, and make it a more democratic polity. The document’s detractors, meanwhile, make one of two critiques. Some say the document is not bold enough, especially on the social front; others claim that it is a watershed but warn that it will blur the precious diaerences among the members’ unique histories and identities, turning the eu into a monolithic “United States of Europe.” The eu’s original sin may be that it was not built on a democratic foundation; its citizens were not asked to vet the union’s creation. But

Development economics · Economics · Political science · European and International Law Studies · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub