One World, Rival Theories
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9832656 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jack Snyder (0000-0003-1256-0673, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Issue | 145 |
| Pages | 52 |
| Publication date | 2004-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Foreign Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0015-7228 • E-ISSN: 1945-2276 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/4152944 |
| OpenAlex | W2475586243 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 50 |
he U.S. government has endured several painful rounds of scrutiny as it tries to figure out what went wrong on Sept. 11, 2001. The intelligence community faces radical restructuring; the military has made a sharp pivot to face a new enemy; and a vast new federal agency has blossomed to coordinate homeland security. But did September 11 signal a failure of theory on par with the failures of intelligence and policy? Familiar theories about how the world works still dominate academic debate. Instead of radical
Adversary · Agency (philosophy · Computer security · Face (sociological concept · Government (linguistics · Homeland · Homeland security · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Restructuring · Scrutiny · Social science · Sociology · Terrorism · Computer Science · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · Law · Philosophy · Public Administration
The Yemeni Civil War
International Relations from Below
The Making of Global International Relations
Tailoring the Arab Spring to American values and interests
International Human Rights Protections Find Support in Hobbes’ Leviathan
The US National Security Strategy
The China Daily ’s framing of THAAD deployment
The Unipolar Torment
Democratism
Significance of Classical Narratives, Visual and Performing Arts in the Contemplation and Configuration of Soft-Power Diplomatic Relationships Between India and Southeast Asia
Subalternization of the global south
The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation
Neorealismus und Internationale Politik im 21. Jahrhundert
Many Worlds, Many Theories
Democratism
Why don't we talk about ‘violence’ in International Relations
Two‐Level Games and Australia's Defence Procurement
Nato and Collective Environmental Security in the Mena
Kyrgyzstan-Turkey Relations
From Idealism to Realism? EU Preferential Trade Agreement Policy
Obama’s wavering
Sacrificial causalities of nuclear weapons
The false promise of global IR
Not Very Material but Hardly Immaterial
The Rift
Havana, Moscow and Washington
The War on Terror and Contemporary U.S.‐European Relations
Triangulating Debates Within the Field
Making Geoeconomics an IR Research Program
Making of an Ally – Nato membership conditionality implemented on Croatia
The rhetoric of tourism diplomacy
Theory or Attitude? A Comparative Analysis of Turkish Newspaper Articles on Turkish Foreign Policy, June 2008–June 2011
Unipolarity, Globalization, and the War on Terror
IR theory and domestic adoption of international norms
Beyond the three ‘isms’
Peacemaking in Intractable Conflict
Democratization, Parliamentary Power, and Belligerency
Teaching the Territories in US Foreign Policy
Trade, non-state actors and conflict
Speaking to The Wall
Treatment format and external validity in international relations experiments
Sailing on Waves beyond National Sovereign Land Borders
The Potential and Pitfalls of a Zero-Sum Grand Strategy
International Law Is, as International Relations Theory Does
International Relations Theory and the Case against Unilateralism
Who Are These Belligerent Democratizers? Reassessing the Impact of Democratization on War
How Political Psychologists Think
Defender of the Faith
Still out in the cold? Russia’s place in a globalizing world
Mainstream IR Theoretical Perspectives and Rising China Vis-À-Vis the West
| Unique citing works | 50 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,38 |
| Citation span | 2005 - 2026 (22) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 50 |