Who Won the Cold War
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9834206 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Deudney (corresponding author), G John Ikenberry |
| Year | 1992 |
| Issue | 87 |
| Pages | 123 |
| Publication date | 1992-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Foreign Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0015-7228 • E-ISSN: 1945-2276 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1149164 |
| OpenAlex | W13104763 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
The end of the Cold War marks the most important historical divide in half a century. The magnitude of those developments has ushered in a wide-ranging debate over the reasons for its end-a debate that is likely to be as protracted, controversial, and politically significant as that over the Cold War's origins. The emerging debate over why the Cold War ended is of more than historical interest: At stake is the vindication and legitimation of an entire world view and foreign policy orientation
Cold war · Economic history · Political science · Politics · History · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
Missile defense
US foreign policy under Reagan and Bush
Public Argument-Driven Security Studies
Security and International Relations
International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War
Culture, Power, and Mission to Moscow
The Role of "Enemy Images" and Ideology of Elite Belief Systems
From ‘I won’t protect you’ to ‘I will’
The End of the Neo-Conservative Moment
The Shape of Elite Opinion on U.S. Foreign Policy, 1992 to 2004
Teaching and scholarship on the Cold War in the United States
Pushing and pulling
Security studies for the next millennium
The future of arms control
Russia's proposal for a new security system
Pragmatic Constructivism and the Study of International Institutions
Perception, causation and German foreign policy
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1992 - 2023 (32) |
| Highly cited | No |