A scenario of solar geoengineering governance
Vulnerable states demand, and act
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9843403 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Felix Schenuit (0000-0003-3695-0588, Universität Hamburg, corresponding author), Jonathan Gilligan (0000-0003-1375-6686, Vanderbilt University), Anjali Viswamohanan (0000-0003-1899-9847) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 132 |
| Pages | 102809 |
| Publication date | 2021-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Futures (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-3287 • E-ISSN: 1873-6378 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.futures.2021.102809 |
| OpenAlex | W3181884102 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 21 |
The paper examines a scenario exercise concerning deployment of solar geoengineering by a small group of states that are particularly vulnerable to climate change. Two groups of participants were each asked to provide expert decision-making advice to an alliance comprising great powers, and to propose a political response to the deployment initiative. This paper discusses the initial governance proposals and examines differences and exchanges between the groups throughout the exercise. The two groups delivered distinct governance proposals. The differences, which were driven largely by divergent worldviews and assumptions about the geopolitical context, provide insights into the complexities of responses to “free-driving” the deployment of solar geoengineering, internal functioning and cohesion of coalitions, and interactions among multiple responses to climate change
Alliance · Business · Climate change · Climate governance · Context (archaeology · Corporate governance · Economics · Environmental resource management · Geoengineering · Geography · Geopolitics · Management · Political science · Politics · Software deployment · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Ecology · Law · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
The Idea Of An Overlapping Consensus
Exit, voice, and loyalty in international organizations
Incompletely Theorized Agreements
Global Inequality
Evoking equity as a rationale for solar geoengineering research? Scrutinizing emerging expert visions of equity
Incomplete agreements and the limits of persuasion in international politics
Exit, voice and loyalty
From the ruins of empire
Solar geoengineering
Necessary Illusions
The untapped potential of preferential trade agreements for climate governance
Institutional Accountability of Nonstate Actors in the UNFCCC
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,8 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2022 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |