Exploring the governance and implementation of sustainable development initiatives through blockchain technology
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9844965 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Karsten Schulz (0000-0002-7503-4817, University of Groningen, autor de correspondencia), Karsten A Schulz, Oskar Josef Gstrein (0000-0003-0546-8684, Fryske Akademy), Andrej Zwitter (0000-0001-7391-141X, Fryske Akademy), Andrej J Zwitter |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 122 |
| Páginas | 102611 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Futures (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0016-3287 • E-ISSN: 1873-6378 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.futures.2020.102611 |
| OpenAlex | W3045732814 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 9 |
| Referencias citadas | 21 |
Societies at large still grapple to categorize digital space as a phenomenon. At the same time, scientists and developers are searching for innovative methods to better understand how the fundamental shifts caused by digital change will affect the future of humanity over the coming decades. Interdisciplinary governance research at the intersection of technological and environmental foresight is urgently needed to minimize the risks of technological change and explore how digitalization may support, hinder or re-shape sustainability transformations. In this article, we focus on the case of ‘blockchain’ or distributed-ledger technology (DLT) to investigate how recent digital technologies may support the implementation of sustainable development initiatives. Our investigation is centered on areas of public administration and governance which will most likely see an adoption of DLT over the next two decades, such as digital identity, social service provision, and innovative climate finance. To allow for a meaningful comparison of various use cases, we propose four guiding questions that can help researchers, decision-makers and practitioners to determine whether DLT might be an appropriate choice for the sustainability-related task at hand. Moreover, we illustrate how the initial design and subsequent implementation of DLTs may support more centralized or networked modes of governance
Business · Corporate governance · Futures studies · Knowledge management · Political science · Process management · Public relations · Sustainability · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Computer Science · FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance · Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Empowering the Circular Transition Through Blockchain
Analyzing the scholarly visibility of blockchain technology research output on social media platforms using altmetrics
Opportunities for and barriers to anticipatory governance of two lake social–ecological systems in Germany and Canada
The effects of blockchain technology adoption on business ethics and social sustainability
Sustainability design approaches
A portrait of the different configurations between digitally-enabled innovations and climate governance
Leveraging blockchain technology for innovative climate finance under the Green Climate Fund
Conjuring a cooler world? Imaginaries of Improvement in Blockchain Climate Finance Experiments
Digital governance for sustainable development
Cloud Communities
Escapist Technology in the Service of Neo-Feudalism
Imaginary politics
Soft Ethics and the Governance of the Digital
Bentham, Deleuze and Beyond
The Blockchain as a Narrative Technology
Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks
Mapping futures studies scholarship from 1968 to present
Leveraging blockchain technology for innovative climate finance under the Green Climate Fund
Anticipating climate futures in a 1.5 °C era
Debating Transformations of National Citizenship
The politics of anticipation
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 9 |