World Literature and Defeat
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9856837 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Purdy (0009-0006-0323-3418, Pennsylvania State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 99 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 78-91 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Germanic Review Literature Culture Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-8890 • E-ISSN: 1930-6962 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00168890.2023.2295462 |
| OpenAlex | W4391545668 |
| Language | EN |
This essay underscores the importance of seeking refuge in literary aesthetics by arguing that Goethe’s concept of world literature was formulated in compensation for the shock of military defeat, political collapse, and foreign occupation. The refugee became a figure of identification in Goethe’s writing in the 1790s and his Orientalist Nachdichtungen. The Goethean mode of reading distant literatures entails identifying with other writers who are often already marginalized within their own cultures. This manner of engaging with non-European texts refuses to establish a pantheon of great works precisely because it relies on a writerly interest in rediscovering one’s own identity by reading foreign literature from a position of insecurity and weakness. The goal of reading is always the reconstruction of the self through a strange text. With its eagerness to establish a monumental cultural figure, the nineteenth and early twentieth-century canon marginalized precisely those unGerman texts in which Goethe most effectively dismantled his own authorial status. Only with the demise of colonial empires and the defeat of Nazi Germany did a more modest, anti-hegemonic mode of reading remerge
Epistemology · Political science · History · Japanese History and Culture · Philosophy · Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies · Translation Studies and Practices
| Highly cited | No |
|---|