Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The ‘Holy Days’ of Queen Elizabeth I

Bibliographic Data

ID9878076
AuthorsNatalie Mears (0000-0002-5442-834X, Durham University, corresponding author), Paul Williamson (0000-0002-5243-4324, Durham University), Philip Williamson
Year2020
Volume105
Issue365
Pages201-228
Publication date2020-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-2648 • E-ISSN: 1468-229X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1468-229x.12971
OpenAlexW3016549037
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited2

The annual celebrations of the accession day and birthday of Queen Elizabeth I are a familiar subject in studies of her reign, yet their beginnings, status and purpose have remained uncertain. By examining revisions of the calendar of the Church of England published in the Book of Common Prayer from early in the reign, this article establishes the dates of the first recognition of these public anniversaries. It questions the weight that has been attached to the evidence for these occasions provided in churchwardens’ accounts, and challenges the conventional interpretations that accession day began and spread as wholly spontaneous, local and popular festivities, and expressed a straightforward patriotic ‘cult’ of the queen. While agreeing that they were not holidays, and explaining that they were not strictly ‘holy days’, it is argued that the two anniversaries began as and continued to be religious occasions, and that their origins are best understood in terms of the religious politics of the Elizabethan state. As other scholars have shown by careful exegesis of sermons addressed to the queen, ‘godly’ clergy persistently urged her to undertake further protestant reformation and firmer anti‐Catholic measures. With the anniversaries and in the forms of prayer for accession day, archbishops and bishops provided opportunities and texts both to sustain loyalty to the actual queen and to stimulate hopes of an ideal queen who would more completely fulfil their understanding of her providential role

Accession · Ancient history · Art · Bishops · Cult · Exegesis · Literature · Political science · Politics · Prayer · Protestantism · Queen (butterfly · Reign · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Classics · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · History · Law · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity · Religious studies

  • Singing the ‘Pope’s Dregs’

    Open Access•James Burke•Journal of the Royal Musical…•2024

  • Memorials of Queen Elizabeth I in early Stuart London

    Natalie Mears•The Seventeenth Century•2022

  • James I and Gunpowder Treason Day

    Open Access•Paul Williamson, Natalie Mears•The Historical Journal•2020

  • Politics and the Paul's Cross Sermons, 1558–1642

    Mary Morrissey, Mary Dr Morrissey•Politics and the Paul's Cross…•2011

  • Register of Sermons Preached at Paul's Cross, 1534-1642.

    Boyd M Berry, Millar Maclure et al.•Shakespeare Quarterly•1992

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2020 - 2024 (5)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae