The Supposed Burning of the Racovian Catechism in 1614
A Historiographical Myth Exposed
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9879167 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ariel Hessayon (0009-0008-4448-2589, Goldsmiths University of London, corresponding author), Diego Lucci (0000-0001-9640-3821, American University in Bulgaria) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 107 |
| Issue | 374 |
| Pages | 25-50 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-2648 • E-ISSN: 1468-229X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-229x.13197 |
| OpenAlex | W3202939587 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 1 |
The Racovian catechism is a famous summary treatise of Socinian thought. It was written in the early seventeenth century by several members of the Minor Reformed Church of Poland. It is a common misconception that, upon reading the Latin edition of the Racovian catechism, which was dedicated to him, King James VI & I consigned it to the flames in 1614. Indeed, a comprehensive list of scholars who have repeated this mistake would take up too much space. Accordingly, the purpose of this article is first and foremost to demonstrate that the Racovian catechism was not burnt in England in 1614. This historiographical myth originated and was transmitted because of a series of misunderstandings occurring since the 1670s, whereas not one primary source testifies to the burning of the catechism in England during James's reign. In the process, we will provide essential context, examining relevant developments not only in the British Isles, but also in the Dutch Republic and the Polish‐Lithuanian Commonwealth. Moreover, we will argue that there is no evidence to support the claim that an edition of the Racovian catechism was secretly printed in England shortly after the supposed burning of 1614, although some subsequent editions of the catechism bore a false imprint and had a connected publishing history. Finally, we will explain how these erroneous assumptions entered the historical record together with their subsequent transmission. Our conclusion is that the early history of anti‐Trinitarianism and Socinianism in England must be rewritten
Archaeology · Art · Catechism · Commonwealth · Context (archaeology · Historiography · Inquest · Literature · Mythology · Political science · Politics · Reign · Theology · Classics · Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland · Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics · History · Law · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |