How not to deal with a rising China
A US perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9898300 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joseph S Nye (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 98 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1635-1651 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-06 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ia/iiac117 |
| OpenAlex | W4313128119 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
Will China displace the United States as the world's leading power by the centenary of Communist rule in 2049? The outcome will depend on many unknowns including what the two countries do over the next three decades. US leaders are likely to rely on their mental maps of how the world works. The primary sources of their mental maps tend to come from historical analogies and from international relations theories. Both are highly imperfect representations of reality. Historical metaphors and analogies are rife in the debate over how to understand the current rise of China, but three are particularly salient: a Thucydides trap; a new Cold War; and 1914 sleepwalkers. This article discusses the merits and demerits of relying on each of these analogies in turn, and assesses the strengths and weaknesses of prior mental maps that guided US policy-makers during the post-Cold War era. Chinese elites expect to replace the US as the leading global power by 2049. How should the US respond? Two prevalent historical analogies are misleading: a Thucydides trap about power transition, and a new Cold War that ignores the three-dimensional nature of US–China interdependence. More promising is the cautionary narrative of sleepwalking into the First World War. A successful strategy must lay out conditions for a cooperative rivalry starting with a careful net assessment of power resources and the formulation of feasible goals
China · Communism · Development economics · Economics · Great power · Narrative · Perspective (graphical · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Power (physics · Rivalry · Sociology · Strengths and weaknesses · Computer Science · Economic and Technological Innovation · Economic Development and Digital Transformation · History · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
Disentangling the Nexus of Nuclear Weapons and Climate Change—A Research Agenda
China’s Grand Strategy in the Context of the Sino-US Strategic Rivalry
Hedging strategy of Turkey in great power competition
Moral imperative and the pursuit of trusted leadership
India's Hedging Strategy in Great Power Competition
Institutionalised Societal Diplomacy
Navigating US-China technology competition among Middle Powers
Multinational Military Exercises, the US Combatant Command System, and the Assembling of the American Security Order
Soft Power Is Bullshit! How Shared Interests, Not Values, Shape International Relations
| Citations per year | 4.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |