Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is US grand strategy dead? The political foundations of deep engagement after Donald Trump

Bibliographic Data

ID9898494
AuthorsJeffrey Friedman (0000-0002-3013-3950, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, corresponding author), Jeffrey A Friedman
Year2022
Volume98
Issue4
Pages1289-1305
Publication date2022-07-05
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ia/iiac112
OpenAlexW4283817828
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited4

International Relations scholars frequently warn that the American political system has become too fractured to sustain a coherent grand strategy. This perception generally rests on two premises: that President Donald Trump led an unprecedented assault on established principles of US foreign policy, and that Democrats and Republicans have become so polarized that they can no longer agree on a common vision for global leadership. By contrast, this article argues that the grand strategy of deep engagement retains robust bipartisan support. Even though President Trump rejected more expansive conceptions of liberal internationalism, his behaviour was largely consistent with deep engagement's principles. Moreover, when Trump departed from deep engagement—as with questioning the US commitment to NATO—his actions did not reflect voters' policy preferences. In fact, polling data indicate that public support for deep engagement is at least as strong today as it has been at any other point since the end of the Cold War. Altogether, the article thus demonstrates that the grand strategy of deep engagement is less embattled, and more politically viable, than the conventional wisdom suggests

Cold war · Expansive · Foreign policy · Grand strategy · International relations · Internationalism (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rules of engagement · Sociology · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law

  • Hawks versus Doves

    Open Access•William Bendix, Gyung-Ho Jeong•Foreign Policy Analysis•2023

  • Small power strategies under great power competition

    Open Access•Ciwan M Can•International Politics•2024

  • Liberal Leviathan

    G John Ikenberry•Liberal Leviathan•2011

  • System Maker and Privilege Taker

    Open Access•Michael Mastanduno, Michael Mastanduno Michael Mastanduno•World Politics•2009

  • Promises under Pressure

    Open Access•Brian Blankenship•International Studies Quarterly•2020

  • The Trump Effect

    Open Access•Benjamin J Newman, Jennifer L Merolla et al.•British Journal of Political…•2021

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae