Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Near abroad

Putin, the West and the contest over Ukraine and the Caucasus

Bibliographic Data

ID9899415
AuthorsNigel Gould-Davies (Mahidol University International College, Thailand, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume94
Issue6
Pages1472-1473
Publication date2018-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ia/iiy215
OpenAlexW2899971730
LanguageEN
Citations received3

The breakup of the Soviet Union created new states with unfamiliar borders that inherited old memories and relationships. This vast upheaval of territorial and imagined space led to a swirling confusion of legacies, identities and aspirations that will take years, even decades, to harden into stable configurations. Gerald Toal's original and thought-provoking study explores these themes through the lens of ‘critical geopolitics’: the study of how states give meaning to their place, their relations with others and their mission in the world. According to critical geography, space is ‘what states make of it’ and it is shaped by identity, myth and narrative. Its emotional and ‘affective’ character can have the force of bodily, sometimes gendered, sensations. Even Yegor Gaidar, Russia's most liberal prime minister, described the country's sense of loss after the Soviet breakup as ‘phantom limb pain’ (p. 47). Critical geopolitics differs from two more familiar discourses: the sparse logic of realism that defines space in terms of military security and the partisan claims of ‘moral geopolitics’ that define—and often anathematize—others in terms of their essential national character. In different ways, both argue that geopolitics is immutable: the first says that Russia is driven by orthodox interests and the second that Russia is inescapably imperial. Instead, critical geopolitics holds that a state's sense of self and space is contingent, can change and may be contested. Rival power networks compete to define the official narrative. For example, economic interests promote a narrative of modernization and accumulation, while power structures emphasize threats of insecurity and instability. Toal identifies three such discourses that jostled in Russia in the 1990s: a liberal European culture; a revived imperial Russia; and an independent Great Power. He is clear that Putin's ‘revanchist agenda’, a version of the last, was implicit even in the Millennium Manifesto, Putin's first public speech on becoming president

Aesthetics · Geopolitics · Identity (music · Narrative · Ontological security · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · European Politics and Security · Gender Studies · Law · Philosophy · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics · Russia and Soviet political economy

  • Dynamics of state-building after war

    Open Access•Kristin M Bakke, Andrew M Linke et al.•Political Geography•2018

  • State Integrity and Self-Determination in a World of Problematic Sovereignty

    Open Access•Sergey Markedonov, Igor Okunev•Quaestio Rossica•2020

  • Accusing Russia of Fascism

    Marlène Laruelle•Russia in Global Affairs•2020

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,38
Citation span2018 - 2020 (3)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae