Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Missile defence and the transatlantic security relationship

Bibliographic Data

ID9902952
AuthorsWyn Q Bowen, Wyn Bowen (0000-0003-4071-1504, corresponding author)
Year2001
Volume77
Issue3
Pages485-507
Publication date2001-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/1468-2346.00203
OpenAlexW1992114540
LanguageEN
Citations received2

This article examines the re-emergence of ballistic missile defence (BMD) as a contentious issue in US-European security relations since 1999. It begins by outlining three phases in the recent evolution of US missile defence policy from 1995 to mid-2001. The article then examines five key factors that have dominated European views and concerns in relation to BMD: a divergence between European and American assessments of the emerging ballistic missile threat; concern over the implications for nuclear arms control stemming from Russian and Chinese opposition to BMD; the impact of missile defence on deterrence and the Atlantic alliance; scepticism about the technological feasibility of BMD; and the potential opportunity costs associated with resource allocation to missile defence. It is shown that European anxieties have been exacerbated by a perception of a growing unilateralism in American security policy in recent years. The article proceeds by arguing that the US-European debate over BMD looks set to evolve in one of two directions. The more likely and most desirable scenario would involve the US reaching an understanding with its European allies on the way forward. The less desirable scenario would involve key European countries, such as France and Germany, deciding ultimately to withhold their political support for BMD, which would have the potential of causing significant rifts in both transatlantic and intra-European security relations. In both cases, it is argued that the BMD debate will be defined by the interaction of several key variables. These include the extent to which the Bush administration engages in meaningful consultations with the Europeans; the administration's ability or otherwise to reach an agreement with Russia on the way ahead; the architecture options of a future allied or global BMD system; the related issues of technological feasibility and financial cost; and the evolving missile threat

Alliance · Ballistic missile · Deterrence theory · Economics · Foreign policy · International trade · Missile · Missile Defense · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Transatlantic relations · Unilateralism · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Engineering · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense

  • The Evolution of International Security Studies

    Open Access•Barry Buzan, Lene Hansen•Evolution of International…•2009

  • A Question of Defense

    Andrew Richter•Comparative Strategy•2004

Citations per year0.09
Citation span2004 - 2009 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae