Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Power, perception and foreign policymaking

US and EU responses to the rise of China

Bibliographic Data

ID9904608
AuthorsTim Summers (0000-0003-1030-9274, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume95
Issue3
Pages748-749
Publication date2019-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ia/iiy230
OpenAlexW2943687926
LanguageEN
Citations received4

Handling the rise of China has not always been at the top of American or European policy agendas, but it probably marks the most strategic interstate issue the US and the EU have faced since the end of the Cold War. To date, most of the attempts to explain or assess the extent of China's rise had the intention of informing or influencing policy-making rather than examining the conclusions policy-makers themselves have drawn. Scott Brown's Power, perception and foreign policymaking therefore offers an important addition to the literature by engaging in an in-depth study of the ways in which policy-makers have evaluated and responded to China's rise. Brown's focus on perceptions is refreshing and responds to the strands of thinking in International Relations which highlight the importance of perceptions and ideas, as opposed to material factors, in the making of foreign policy. Following an introductory chapter which sets out the approach of the book clearly and concisely, chapter two categorizes different interpretations of China's rise by policy-makers in the US and EU. It does so across three factors: military threat or military non-threat; economic threat or economic opportunity; and normative threat or political opportunity. This enables Brown to bring out the differences between the US and EU: military threat interpretations have been a regular feature of policy-thinking in the US, for example, but not in the EU, where interpretations based on economic opportunity or political opportunity have been more common than across the Atlantic

China · Development economics · Economics · Foreign policy · Great power · International relations · Normative · Perception · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · European Union Policy and Governance · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics · Psychology

  • The China–EU relation and media representation of China

    Open Access•Qingning Wang•Asia Europe Journal•2022

  • Pulled East. The rise of China, Europe and French security policy in the Asia-Pacific

    Hugo Meijer•Journal of Strategic Studies•2023

  • The art of the deal? The EU’s strategic adaptation to Trump’s transatlantic trade policy

    Open Access•Scott A W Brown•Journal of Transatlantic Studies•2022

  • Adapting to adversity? EU trade policy in a more geopolitical world

    Open Access•Alasdair R Young•Comparative European Politics•2025

Citations per year1
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae