Resolution 242
A Legal Reappraisal of the Right-Wing Israeli Interpretation of the Withdrawal Phrase with Reference to the Conflict Between Israel and the Palestinians
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9928252 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John McHugo (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 851-881 |
| Publication date | 2002-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International and Comparative Law Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5893 • E-ISSN: 1471-6895 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1093/iclq/51.4.851 |
| OpenAlex | W2105891141 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 7 |
In the Six Day War in June 1967, East Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip came under Israeli military occupation, as well as the Sinai Peninsula and the Golan Heights. On 22 November that year, the UN Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 242, which it was hoped would provide a route to a permanent peace. It seems clear that Resolution 242 now has binding force 1 and that it is accepted by all parties today that Resolution 242 sets out the principles which must be applied in order to reach a settlement. The Resolution is recited in the preambles to the Oslo Accords. 2 This means that, in addition, it is binding on Israel and the PLO by agreement. 3
Ancient history · Archaeology · Conflict resolution · Genealogy · Interpretation (philosophy · Peninsula · Phrase · Political science · Resolution (logic · Settlement (finance · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · History · International Law and Aviation · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.23 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2004 - 2025 (22) |
| Highly cited | No |