The Diverging Approaches of the European Court of Human Rights in the Cases of Nada and Al-Dulimi
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9928402 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephan Hollenberg (European University Institute, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 445-460 |
| Publication date | 2015-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International and Comparative Law Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5893 • E-ISSN: 1471-6895 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0020589315000123 |
| OpenAlex | W2172146089 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 9 |
The UN Security Council's practice of targeted sanctions has resulted in serious limitations on the enjoyment of targeted individuals' human rights. The European Court of Human Rights pronounced on this issue in two instances. In the cases of Nada (Grand Chamber judgment) and al-Dulimi (Chamber judgment) the Court was asked to evaluate the lawfulness of the domestic implementation of sanction measures against the ECHR. Surprisingly, each Chamber opted for a different solution. The present article will discuss these solutions and evaluate them within the broader framework of international law, the Court's jurisprudence, and the conflicting interests involved
Human rights · Jurisprudence · Political science · Sanctions · International Arbitration and Investment Law · International Law and Human Rights · Law · World Trade Organization Law
On the Al Qaida/Taliban Sanctions Regime
From Kadi to Nada
Al-Skeini and Al-Jedda in Strasbourg
The Security Council's 1267/1989 Targeted Sanctions Regime and the Use of Confidential Information
The European Court of Human Rights’ Approach to the Responsibility of Member States in Connection With Acts of International Organizations
| Highly cited | No |
|---|