Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Recent Bit Decisions and Composite Acts Straddling the Date a Treaty Comes into Force

Bibliographic Data

ID9928405
AuthorsNick Gallus (corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume56
Issue3
Pages491-513
Publication date2007-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5893 • E-ISSN: 1471-6895
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1093/iclq/lei180
OpenAlexW2008134512
LanguageEN
References cited8

The success of an international claim impugning a series of State acts, or a ‘composite act’, straddling the date a treaty comes into force can depend on the weight the tribunal gives to the elements of the composite act occurring before that date. Recent bilateral investment treaty decisions highlight ambiguities on this critical issue. One tribunal practically ignored State acts occurring before the treaty came into force in finding that there had been no breach of the treaty, whereas another tribunal considered those previous acts in reaching the opposite conclusion. This paper identifies steps to ensure future tribunals give consistent weight to the elements of a composite act occurring before a treaty comes into force

Bilateral investment treaty · Foreign direct investment · International investment · Political science · State (computer science · Treaty · Tribunal · Computer Science · International Arbitration and Investment Law · Law

  • Time and the Law

    Open Access•Rosalyn Higgins•International and Comparative Law…•1997

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae