Directive 93/13 and the ‘Price Term Exemption’
A Comparative Analysis in the Light of the ‘Market for Lemons’ Rationale
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9929288 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Anderson Schillig (0000-0002-8086-2588, King's College School, corresponding author), Michael Schillig |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 933-963 |
| Publication date | 2011-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International and Comparative Law Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5893 • E-ISSN: 1471-6895 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0020589311000443 |
| OpenAlex | W1986652185 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
In the light of the Supreme Court decision in OFT v Abbey National on unarranged overdraft fees in current account contracts, this article analyses the price term exemption at the heart of Directive 93/13 in its European context, and on a comparative basis. It argues for an interpretation in line with the ‘market for lemons’ rationale, which best fits the regulatory outline of Directive 93/13, and the European Court of Justice's case law. Under this approach, only those contract terms that are subject to the correcting forces of markets and competition are part of the ‘main subject matter of the contract’ and should be exempt from assessment of fairness under Directive 93/13
Business · Competition (biology · Context (archaeology · Directive · Economic Justice · Economics · European court of justice · European union · European Union law · International economics · Interpretation (philosophy · Law and economics · Overdraft · Political science · Subject (documents · Subject matter · Supreme court · Term (time · Diverse Legal and Medical Studies · European and International Contract Law · Finance · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
| Highly cited | No |
|---|