Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice

A Myth

Bibliographic Data

ID9929634
AuthorsShigeru Oda (corresponding author)
Year2000
Volume49
Issue2
Pages251-277
Publication date2000-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5893 • E-ISSN: 1471-6895
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0020589300064150
OpenAlexW2115375683
LanguageEN

It is my intention to appeal to scholars of a younger generation to undertake research on the thesis which, on the basis of my experience at the International Court of Justice–and I have been a serving Member for almost a quarter of a century–I shall be presenting in this paper. In my view, one subject missing from contemporary studies on the function and work of the International Court of Justice is a pragmatic examination of the manner in which certain contentious cases presented to the International Court of Justice have disappeared from view and of whether a judgment, once handed down, has actually been complied with by the parties to the dispute

Appeal · Economic Justice · International court · International law · Jurisdiction · Mythology · Political science · Public international law · Sociology · Subject (documents · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · History · International Arbitration and Investment Law · International Law and Human Rights · Law

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae