The Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice
A Myth
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9929634 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shigeru Oda (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 251-277 |
| Publication date | 2000-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International and Comparative Law Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5893 • E-ISSN: 1471-6895 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0020589300064150 |
| OpenAlex | W2115375683 |
| Language | EN |
It is my intention to appeal to scholars of a younger generation to undertake research on the thesis which, on the basis of my experience at the International Court of Justice–and I have been a serving Member for almost a quarter of a century–I shall be presenting in this paper. In my view, one subject missing from contemporary studies on the function and work of the International Court of Justice is a pragmatic examination of the manner in which certain contentious cases presented to the International Court of Justice have disappeared from view and of whether a judgment, once handed down, has actually been complied with by the parties to the dispute
Appeal · Economic Justice · International court · International law · Jurisdiction · Mythology · Political science · Public international law · Sociology · Subject (documents · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · History · International Arbitration and Investment Law · International Law and Human Rights · Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |