The Legal Regime for Free Trade in the Commonwealth of Independent States
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9929857 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rilka Dragneva (0000-0002-3620-5417, University of Manchester, corresponding author), Joop De Kort |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 233-266 |
| Publication date | 2007-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International and Comparative Law Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5893 • E-ISSN: 1471-6895 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1093/iclq/lei164 |
| OpenAlex | W2165871146 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 16 |
Whether through the framework of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) or outside of it, the former Soviet republics continue to seek and depend on economic cooperation with each other, particularly in the area of trade in goods. This article examines the legal framework for free trade in the post-Soviet space and discusses its role in fostering effective regional cooperation. The focus is on the multiplication of regimes at the bilateral and multilateral (CIS) level—a particular blend of ‘à; la carte multilateralism’ and multiple bilateralism—and their respective features in terms of legal nature, substantive scope, and disciplining mechanisms, as well as the implications of their overlap. We find that both the bilateral and the multilateral regimes have undergone significant (often underestimated) development, and that the multilateral regime has generally sought to be more ambitious both in its substantive and institutional reach. Yet, both regimes can be described as ultimately weak and their overlap confusing. While a higher juridicization and comprehensive consolidation at the multilateral level of the CIS free trade regime may be recommended, we remain sceptical about its likelihood in the short and medium term
Bilateralism · Commonwealth · Consolidation (business · Economics · Free trade · International economics · International trade · Multilateralism · Political science · Scope (computer science · Skepticism · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · Economic Zones and Regional Development · Global trade and economics · Law
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,18 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2016 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |