Decisions of International Tribunals
International Court of Justice: I. Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July 1996 in the Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Yugoslavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v Bosnia and Herzegovina), Judgment of 3 February 2003
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9929986 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicholas Tsagourias (0000-0002-1701-2572, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 731-737 |
| Publication date | 2004-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International and Comparative Law Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5893 • E-ISSN: 1471-6895 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1093/iclq/53.3.731 |
| OpenAlex | W1968167714 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 4 |
In its judgment of 3 February 2003, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) declared the application submitted by the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) for revision of its 1996 judgment concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, inadmissible. 1 The Court found that the request for revision was not based on the ‘discovery’ of a ‘fact’ and, therefore, one of the conditions of Article 61 of the Statute of the Court was not satisfied. This commentary will appraise the decision by examining the formal and substantive criteria for revision, a rather neglected and underused process. 2
Convention · Economic Justice · Genocide · International court · International law · Political science · Public international law · Punishment (psychology · Statute · Statute of limitations · European and International Law Studies · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.11 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2017 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |