Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cohabitants in Private Law

Trust, Frustration and Unjust Enrichment in England, Germany and Canada

Bibliographic Data

ID9931078
AuthorsAnne E Sanders (0000-0003-2607-9514, University of Cologne, corresponding author), Anne Sanders (0000-0003-0405-2919)
Year2013
Volume62
Issue3
Pages629-665
Publication date2013-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5893 • E-ISSN: 1471-6895
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0020589313000158
OpenAlexW2137015572
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited33

Neither in England, nor in Germany, nor in all Canadian provinces, does the law provide specific rules for the redistribution of property for unmarried cohabitants after the breakdown of their relationship. Instead, courts apply the law of trusts, contract and unjust enrichment with an eye to the characteristics of intimate relationships, as, for example, in decisions like the English Jones v Kernott ([2011] UKSC 53) and the Canadian Kerr v Baranow (2011 SCC 10). This article compares English, Canadian, and German case law and evaluates it both from a doctrinal perspective and as a part of a general approach towards cohabitation. The article concludes with an appeal for legislative action that strikes the right balance between party autonomy and protection of the weaker party

Appeal · Autonomy · Cohabitation · Common law · Comparative law · Geography · German · Legislature · Political science · Private law · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction · Law · Legal principles and applications · Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies

  • Comparing family property disputes in English and Singapore law

    Open Access•Man Yip•Legal Studies•2021

  • Gender and Changes in Household Wealth after the Dissolution of Marriage and Cohabitation in Germany

    Open Access•D Boertien, P M Lersch•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2021

  • Anmerkung

    Nina Dethloff•JuristenZeitung•2009

  • Condictio ob rem und Rückabwicklung gemeinschaftsbezogener Zuwendungen in nichtehelichen Lebensgemeinschaften

    Christoph Sorge•JuristenZeitung•2011

  • Rechtsträgerschaft für fremde Rechnung

    Georg Bitter•Rechtsträgerschaft für fremde…•2020

  • Cohabitation, Family & Society

    Tiziana Nazio•Cohabitation, Family and Society•2008

  • Gender, sexuality and the doctrine of detrimental reliance

    Open Access•Leo Flynn, Anna Lawson•Feminist Legal Studies•1995

  • Private Autonomy and Marital Property Agreements

    Open Access•Anne E Sanders, Anne Sanders•International and Comparative Law…•2010

  • Cohabitation and Comparative Method

    Open Access•Robert Leckey•Modern Law Review•2009

  • Regulating Marriage and Cohabitation in 21 st Century Britain

    Open Access•Anne Barlow, Grace James•Modern Law Review•2004

  • Intention, Fairness and the Presumption of Resulting Trust after Stack v Dowden

    Open Access•Nick Piska•Modern Law Review•2008

  • A Historical Introduction to the Law of Obligations

    Thomas P Gallanis, David Ibbetson et al.•American Journal of Legal History•2000

  • Taking Rights Seriously

    Ronald Dworkin•Taking Rights Seriously•2013

  • The Rise of Cohabitation in Quebec

    Open Access•Benoit Laplante•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•2006

Citations per year0.4
Citation span2021 - 2021 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae