The Cisg and the United Kingdom—exploring Coherency and Private International Law
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9933429 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Benjamin Hayward (0000-0001-7409-7966, Monash University, corresponding author), Bruno Zeller (The University of Western Australia), Camilla Baasch Andersen (0000-0002-8231-7057, The University of Western Australia) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 607-641 |
| Publication date | 2018-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International and Comparative Law Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5893 • E-ISSN: 1471-6895 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0020589318000088 |
| OpenAlex | W2804172764 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 10 |
The United Kingdom remains one of the world's last industrialized nations not to have adopted the CISG. The UK CISG debate has endured for decades, with existing analysis largely focusing on competition, assessing the relative merits of the CISG and English law. This article's analysis is complementary; focusing instead on coherence, and the private international law implications of UK accession. This article assesses contractual interpretation, and commodity sales, within an overarching private international law framework. Recognizing the necessity of existing competitive analyses, it makes the case for UK CISG accession on the basis of its complementary coherency perspective
Accession · Business · Commodity · Competition (biology · Competition law · Economics · European union · International trade · Interpretation (philosophy · Kingdom · Law and economics · Market economy · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction · Corporate Governance and Law · European and International Contract Law · Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|