The 1996 Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion and Non Liquet in International Law

Following extensive debate by the great theoreticians of public international law earlier in this century, 1 it might seem that the completeness of the international legal order is now a banal issue, which should be remembered only as an academic dispute. 2 It might have been so had the International Court of Justice not intervened, perhaps unintentionally, in its advisory opinion of 8 July 1996 concerning the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons 3 In her dissenting opinion, Judge Rosalyn Higgins argues that “the Court effectively pronounces a non liquet on the key issue on the grounds of uncertainty in the present state of law, and of facts”. 4 In her view, the Court thus interrupted a line of case law which, in theory, had endorsed the idea of the completeness of international law and which, in practice, made it unthinkable that an international judge or arbitrator should actually pronounce a non liquet . 5

Advisory opinion · Dissenting opinion · Economic Justice · International court · International humanitarian law · International law · Political science · Principle of legality · Public international law · State (computer science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Environmental Law and Policies · International Law and Human Rights · Law

• La Cour internationale de justice

  Luigi Condorelli•European Journal of International…•1995

  Incluir item

• Les Sources Du Droit International

  Bruce King, B E King•International Affairs•1949

  Incluir item

• The Opinions of the International Court of Justice on the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons

  Open Access•Michael J Matheson•American Journal of International…•1997

  Incluir item

• Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador/Honduras), Application to Intervene

  Open Access•Sidney Ratner, Steven R Ratner•American Journal of International…•1991

  Incluir item