Bhopal, Bougainville and OK Tedi
Why Australia's forum non conveniens approach is better
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9934265 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter Prince (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 573-598 |
| Publication date | 1998-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International and Comparative Law Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5893 • E-ISSN: 1471-6895 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0020589300062187 |
| OpenAlex | W2164909528 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Despite its Latin tag, forum non conveniens is far from a dry, legalistic issue. Indeed, it is fair to say that a highly emotional debate has raged on this topic in recent years, with accusations of “parochialism”, “naked and open chauvinism” and even outright racism on one side, and “chaotic transnational jurisprudence” and lack of clear guidance on the other
Chauvinism · Jurisprudence · Parochialism · Political science · Law · Minority Rights and Languages · Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism · World Trade Organization Law
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,1 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2016 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |