The Interpretation of Article 30 of the EC Treaty and the “Dormant” Commerce Clause by the European Court of Justice and the US Supreme Court
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9934523 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Georg Haibach (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 155-167 |
| Publication date | 1999-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International and Comparative Law Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5893 • E-ISSN: 1471-6895 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0020589300062916 |
| OpenAlex | W2038233075 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
There are numerous publications on the interpretation of Article 30 of the EC Treaty by the European Court of Justice 1 which for the last 20 years has been one of the most controversial issues in EC law. It is, however, surprising that there is much older, yet strikingly similar, case law of the US Supreme Court which has remained almost unnoticed in Europe. In this article the respective case law of the two courts will be compared. Such a comparison is not only of interest as such, but can also contribute to the discussion about the correct scope of Article 30—which has certainly not yet been exhausted
Commerce Clause · Economic Justice · Economics · European court of justice · European union · European Union law · Federalism · Interpretation (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Precedent · Scope (computer science · Supreme court · Treaty · EU Law and Policy Analysis · European and International Law Studies · Law · Philosophy · Taxation and Legal Issues
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |