Clarifying Human Rights Standards Through Artificial Intelligence Initiatives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9934536 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lottie Lane (0000-0002-2986-3075, University of Groningen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 915-944 |
| Publication date | 2022-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International and Comparative Law Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5893 • E-ISSN: 1471-6895 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0020589322000380 |
| OpenAlex | W4306871380 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 5 |
Taking a law-and-governance approach, this article addresses legal certainty in international human rights law as it applies to artificial intelligence (AI). After introducing key issues concerning legal certainty, a comparative analysis of AI law-and-governance initiatives at the international, regional and national levels is undertaken. The article argues that many initiatives contribute to increased legal certainty and can partially compensate for some of the shortcomings of the international human rights law framework, but that further clarification is badly needed. This is especially true for the responsibilities of private businesses which are developing AI and the corpus of human rights beyond privacy and data protection
Business · Certainty · Corporate governance · Epistemology · Human rights · International human rights law · International law · Law and economics · Legal certainty · Political science · Public international law · Sociology · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies · Law · Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |