Reason over passion

Within the literature on human rights, the 1970s are often viewed as a period in which rights achieved a breakthrough globally. While rights regimes, activist networks, and the overall discourse of human rights certainly came into their own during this decade, the rights revolution had its limitations, particularly at the international level. In the Canadian context, the government of Pierre Trudeau advanced a domestic rights program, culminating in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In terms of foreign policy, however, Trudeau was far more cautious. Tracing Pierre Trudeau’s stance toward international human rights, this article points to the prime minister’s realist outlook as having delimited the place of rights in Canadian foreign policy during his time in office. Thus, there was little enthusiasm on the part of the Canadian government to support self-determination movements, to impose bilateral sanctions against abhorrent regimes, or to loudly condemn rights violators when doing so would seemingly accomplish little. The point of this paper is not to condemn Trudeau, but rather to understand why Canada’s rights revolution stopped at the water’s edge

Charter · Context (archaeology · Enthusiasm · Foreign policy · Fundamental rights · Human rights · International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights · International human rights law · Linguistic rights · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Right to property · Rights of Nature · Sanctions · Sociology · Canadian Identity and History · Canadian Policy and Governance · History · Law · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies

• Let My People Go

  Open Access•Saundra Lipton•Canadian Jewish Studies / Études…•2025

  Add to list

• Trading rights for riches

  Open Access•Patrick Ronald Fraser•Cambridge Review of International…•2026

  Add to list