True self-help
Internal balancing and China's non-alliance behaviour since the 1990s
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9941919 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ronaldo Au-Yeung (0000-0002-3324-9553, Simon Fraser University, corresponding author), Alsu Tagirova (0000-0003-0375-5225, Academy of History and Documentation of Socialism, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 463-485 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-7020 • E-ISSN: 2052-465X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00207020251372184 |
| OpenAlex | W4413987251 |
| Language | EN |
Why has post–Cold War China not formed an alliance, when it is the most likely candidate to balance against the US? This essay addresses a major criticism of balance-of-power theory—the absence of a counter-American alliance—by submitting a neorealist explanation to the question. It argues that while China has consistently pursued internal balancing, power distribution in the international system has made external balancing nonviable. As a non-pole in the early post–Cold War period, Beijing pursued internal balancing in unipolarity because it faced limited alliance candidates and considerable power disparity vis-à-vis the resident hegemon. As a superpower in today's bipolarity, China's alliance behaviour in the short to medium run is constrained by two structural intervening variables: continued alliance partner unavailability and fears of entrapment, both of which are determined by the power distribution in the previous unipolar system
Alliance · Business · China · Political science · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|