Construct Equivalence of Left-Right Scale Placement in a Cross-National Perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9952010 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cornelia Zuell (GESIS–Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences; Survey Design and Methodology, Mannheim, Germany), Evi Scholz (GESIS–Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences; Monitoring Society and Social Change, Mannheim, Germany, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 77-95 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-7659 • E-ISSN: 1557-9336 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00207659.2018.1560982 |
| OpenAlex | W2923908787 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 18 |
Equivalence in survey design and implementation is a core issue in cross-national research. Construct equivalence deals with the validity of concepts measured by survey questions and is a prerequisite for meaningful cross-national analyses. Since respondents are socialized in different cultures and political systems, their interpretation of concepts in the same way cannot be taken for granted. This study is about the construct equivalence of the left-right scale from a cross-national perspective. The left-right scale is a standard survey question used to measure ideological orientation in a minimalist way. However, ideological orientation may be measured in different dimensions from cross-national perspective, and thus, the conceptual understanding of the left-right scale as an indicator of the left-right dimension may differ across countries, which may challenge the comparability and the cross-national validity of the left-right scale. To test the understanding of left and right, we asked about individual associations by using probe questions in a cross-national survey. We checked for nonresponse and shared and country-specific explanations of left and right. Our results show that respondents from different countries or with different political orientations do not have the same ideas about left and right. For leftist respondents, shared explanations of left are more relevant, whereas for rightists, country-specific interpretations of right are more influential. These results challenge the cross-national usability of the left-right scale, and so conclusions based on this scale may not be comparable
Comparability · Construct (python library · Construct validity · Equivalence (formal languages · Geography · Ideology · Left and right · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Politics · Psychometrics · Scale (ratio · Sociology · Statistics · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology
Utilitarian and Ideological Determinants of Attitudes towards Immigration
Mapping left-right associations
Scale matters
Coding Issues of Open-Ended Questions in a Cross-Cultural Context
The Political Parties Crosswalk for mapping party codes in cross-national surveys to Party Facts IDs
Left and right in the age of populism
French Fox News? Audience-level metrics for the comparative study of news audience hyperpartisanship
Who's left, who's right? Examining cross-national variations in the use of the left–right scale with anchoring vignettes
Between class conflict and culture war. How left-right self-positioning reflects elite conflict and social-economic context
CSES 25th anniversary special issue
The wealth of nations matters
Eastern Europe is no exception
Extremism at the center
How stable are ‘left’ and ‘right’? A morphological analysis using open-ended survey responses of parliamentary candidates
How do elites view ideology? Analysing candidates’ associations of left and right
A Tale of Two Regions
Explaining youth radicalism as a positioning of the self at opposite extremes
An urban myth? Government involvement in the economy and left–right politics
A political Esperanto, or false friends? Left and right in different political contexts
Anchoring Vignettes as a Diagnostic Tool for Cross-National (in)Comparability of Survey Measures
Spatial and valence models of voting
Political ideology predicts preventative behaviors and infections amid Covid-19 in democracies
Handbook of Social Psychology
The Left-Right Schema
Methodological Aspects of Central Left-Right Scale Placement in a Cross-national Perspective
Item non-response in open-ended questions
Kultur und Gesellschaft
Terms of exclusion
The Rise of Anti-foreigner Sentiment in European Societies, 1988-2000
The Practice of Cross-Cultural Cognitive Interviewing
Testing for Measurement Equivalence in Surveys
Is the Left-Right Scale a Valid Measure of Ideology
Between ideology and social representations
What Cognitive Interviews Tell Us about Bias in Cross-cultural Research
Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research
Do Foreigners Deserve Rights? Determinants of Public Views Towards Foreigners in Germany and Israel
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |