Aid, Relief, and Containment
The First Asylum Country and Beyond
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9952895 |
|---|---|
| Authors | B S Chimni (0000-0003-0755-9811, Jawaharlal Nehru University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 75-94 |
| Publication date | 2002-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Migration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-7985 • E-ISSN: 1468-2435 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-2435.00212 |
| OpenAlex | W2077749360 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
A fundamental problem that confronts the European Union today is how it can maintain its commitment to the institution of asylum while checking irregular migration and the abuse of its asylum system. In order to explore a response to this dilemma the paper addresses the following questions: what role can relief and aid policies play in influencing migration patterns? What should be the appropriate approach to the granting of relief and aid to developing countries of first asylum? Should it be viewed as a part of the larger problem of development or be treated as a distinct issue? What kind of a relief/aid model will help refugees return to post–conflict societies and stop the conflict from reproducing itself? The paper examines two different approaches to address these questions: the alliance–containment approach and the distributive–developmental approach. It also looks at some empirical evidence, which reveals that at present it is a conservative alliance–containment approach that informs EU relief and aid practices. This approach, however, does not help achieve the stated objective of checking abuse of asylum and migration procedures while sustaining a commitment to a liberal asylum regime. The paper goes on to identify the gaps in EU policy and the lessons that can be drawn. It concludes by looking at different policy alternatives and suggesting the adoption of a reformist distributive–developmental model. The implementation of this model holds out the hope of reverting to a more liberal asylum regime while controlling irregular migration and “bogus” asylum seekers, for the reformist distributive developmental model takes a more long–term view of migration trends and also seeks to address the growing North–South divide
Alliance · Containment (computer programming · Dilemma · Institution · Law and economics · Political science · Refugee · Sociology · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Development and Aid · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Burden Sharing and Refugee Protection
Immobility and the containment of solutions
La « crise migratoire » de 2015/16 en Europe
Refugee agency in secondary mobility decision-making
Migrant labour, and the neo-liberal development paradigm
Migrant necropolitics in No Man’s Land camps
From Border Control to Migration Management
Camp Abolition
Routes to illegal residence
Symbolic Rewards as Migration Diplomacy
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,48 |
| Citation span | 2005 - 2025 (21) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |