Creative Recourse in Cases of Forced Labour

Using Human Trafficking, Human Rights and Labour Law to Protect Migrant Workers

Bibliographic Data

ID9955209
AuthorsLaurence Matte Guilmain (Université du Québec à Montréal Montreal, corresponding author), Jill Hanley (0000-0002-7987-9235, McGill University Montreal)
Year2020
Volume59
Issue2
Pages126-139
Publication date2020-07-23
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Migration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-7985 • E-ISSN: 1468-2435
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/imig.12743
OpenAlexW3045330441
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited10

Canada has no legislation prohibiting forced labour, relying instead on human trafficking penal dispositions; the two are intimately related. However, there has only been one conviction for human trafficking for the purposes of forced labour. Here, we offer an analysis of jurisprudence according to a model of labour trafficking focusing on the intersection of labour exploitation and coercion, particularly among migrant workers. We argue that Canadian human trafficking law remains incomplete and fails to address situations of forced labour. There is a need to think creatively about recourses. Labour and human rights law recourses are more accessible to migrant workers than human trafficking law, given the lighter burden of proof and the unlikelihood that courts will recognize the systemic coercion to which migrant workers are subject. Workers and advocates are understandably drawn to these alternative recourses, yet consequences for employers profiting from forced labour are disappointingly minor

Coercion (linguistics · Conviction · Criminology · Economic growth · Economics · Forced migration · Human rights · Human trafficking · Jurisprudence · Labour law · Legislation · Migrant workers · Political science · Refugee · Sociology · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · International Labor and Employment Law · Law · Sex work and related issues

Tools

Open DOI