Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Aligning vertical structures and horizontal relationships

Collaborative leadership and accountability mechanisms to enhance economic growth in England

Bibliographic Data

ID9961815
AuthorsJoanna Liddle (0000-0001-5568-3273, Aix-Marseille Université, corresponding author), Joyce Liddle (Aix-Marseille Université)
Year2018
Volume84
Issue4
Pages659-674
Publication date2018-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Review of Administrative Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-8523 • E-ISSN: 1461-7226
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0020852316651694
OpenAlexW2506103809
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited33

This article explores vertical and horizontal dimensions of the work of public, private and civic leaders involved in economic development in England, in particular, those working in the complex terrain of Local Enterprise Partnerships, a key partnership tool in the UK central government’s localism agenda for driving growth. It offers insights into innovative ways in which state, non-state and citizen agents navigate a complex set of vertical, legal authority structures within fragmented, horizontal and largely informal new ‘spaces’ of interactions/interrelationships to collaboratively co-produce strategies and plans for transforming local areas. To advance our knowledge of collaborative leadership requires new methodological approaches to investigating multi-accountabilities and how co-production works within ‘loosely coupled’ networks. It is imperative to appreciate the problems associated with leadership working across sectoral boundaries within complex networks of vertical, legal structures and horizontal, informal action spaces. In such networks, leaders, as institutional representatives, work collaboratively to achieve objectives not readily attainable by member organisations acting alone. They also need to compromise and negotiate their representative role back to a parent organisation while protecting and promoting the priorities, aims and interests of the new entity, in this case, a Local Enterprise Partnership. Theoretically, then, the article is located in recent debates on the theory and practice of New Public Governance, to show the inadequacies of New Public Management models for capturing the complexities between formal authority structures and fragmented informal sets of relationships. It also draws on accountability models, notably, from the Utrecht School, to identify social relations between collaborative leaders on Local Enterprise Partnerships, and to show how they assert agency and individual actions within the boundaries of participating institutions

Accountability · Corporate governance · Economics · General partnership · Horizontal and vertical · Localism · Management · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Law · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Public-Private Partnership Projects

  • New Paths for Public Governance

    Open Access•Érica Raschendorfer, Ariane Cristine Roder Figueira et al.•Administration & Society•2024

  • The dynamics of sub-national leadership and rapport in transnational partnership working

    Open Access•Abigail Taylor, Jason Read et al.•Regional Studies•2025

  • Does vertical administrative integration of environmental monitoring at the provincial level effectively motivate firms to improve environmental behaviour in China

    Open Access•Yong Liu•International Review of…•2018

  • Vertical reform of environmental protection, corruption and enterprise pollution reduction—a quasi-natural experiment based on 238 cities in China

    Open Access•Yanbo Zhang, Yaning Chen et al.•Environment Development and…•2024

  • The struggle for linking strategic and front-line outcomes in local government service delivery

    Open Access•Joanna Liddle, Joyce Liddle et al.•Local Government Studies•2024

  • Practitioners’ perspectives on in-house versus arm’s-length structures of local economic development delivery in Ontario, Canada

    Adrian Buttazzoni, Godwin Arku et al.•Local Government Studies•2019

  • Local government procurement in English regions

    Open Access•Steven Parker, Joanna Liddle et al.•Local Government Studies•2024

  • Holding Power to Account

    Open Access•Richard Mulgan•Holding Power to Account•2003

  • Modernising Governance

    Janet Newman•Modernising Governance•2001

  • Public Management Reform

    Christopher Pollitt, Geert Bouckaert•Public management reform•2004

  • The New Public Governance?

    Erik Hans Klijn, Stephen P Osborne•The new public governance•2010

  • Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism

    David L Deephouse, Mark C Suchman et al.•The SAGE Handbook of Organizational…•2008

  • Towards Post-political Consensus in Urban Policy? Localism and the Emerging Agenda for Regeneration Under the Cameron Government

    Iain Deas•Planning Practice and Research•2013

  • The global management revolution

    Open Access•Martha S Feldman•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2001

  • Beyond New Public Governance

    Open Access•Guoxian Bao, Xuejun Wang et al.•Administration & Society•2013

  • Urban Politics Reconsidered

    Open Access•Gordon Macleod•Urban Studies•2011

  • Local Economic Development Partnerships

    Robert J Bennett, Günter Krebs•Regional Studies•1994

  • Public–Private Partnerships and the Public Accountability Question

    Open Access•John Forrer, James Edwin Kee et al.•Public Administration Review•2010

  • The Coalition Programme

    Open Access•Peter Taylor-Gooby, Peter Taylor‐gooby et al.•The Political Quarterly•2011

  • Symposium on Public–Private Partnerships Revisited

    Open Access•Kenneth Kernaghan•International Review of…•2004

  • Public–Private Partnerships

    Open Access•T Bovaird•International Review of…•2004

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Per Lægreid, Paola Mattei•International Review of…•2013

  • Value practices and public management

    Open Access•Véronique Chanut, Hervé Chomienne et al.•International Review of…•2015

  • The empirical assessment of agency accountability

    Open Access•Jan Biela, Yannis Papadopoulos•International Review of…•2014

  • Accountability Challenges in Networks and Partnerships

    Open Access•Muhittin Acar, Peter J Robertson•International Review of…•2004

  • The hybrid universe of public administration in the 21st century

    Open Access•Guest editors Y Emery, David Giauque•International Review of…•2014

  • Mapping accountability

    Open Access•Staffan I Lindberg•International Review of…•2013

  • Territory, authority, rights

    Saskia Sassen•Territory, authority, rights•2006

  • Debate

    Open Access•Joanna Liddle, Joyce Liddle•Policy & Politics•2010

  • Treating Networks Seriously

    Laurence J O’toole, Laurence J O'Toole•Public Administration Review•1997

  • Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

    Christopher Ansell, Chris Ansell et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2007

  • Business Goes Local

    Open Access•J Peck, Adam Tickell•International Journal of Urban…•1995

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,88
Citation span2018 - 2025 (8)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae