Stakeholder engagement and the future of Irish public–private partnerships
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 9961983 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Gail Sheppard (0000-0003-1404-6977, Technological University Dublin, autor de correspondencia), Matthias Beck (0000-0002-5664-2438, University College Cork) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 88 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 843-861 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Review of Administrative Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0020-8523 • E-ISSN: 1461-7226 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0020852320971692 |
| OpenAlex | W3112901426 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 28 |
Building on recent works that stress the importance of stakeholder engagement in partnerships, we propose a novel benchmarking framework for the evaluation of public–private partnerships. This framework describes mutuality and the preservation of organisational identity as the ideal characteristics of partnerships because they, in turn, encourage stakeholder support for public–private partnerships. Applying this framework to infrastructure public–private partnerships in Ireland, we note that mutual accountability has been weakened following the financial crisis. Meanwhile, consultation with clients such as key public–private partnership stakeholders, which would help articulate organisational identities, remains patchy across the education, justice and health public–private partnership that we investigate. Nonetheless, there are sectoral differences. In education, consultation centres on school principals while ignoring teaching staff and trade unions. In justice, attention is focused primarily on judges. Similarly, in health sector public–private partnerships, there is a strong focus on clinicians. Overall, private sector-driven consultation efforts are primarily pragmatic, with a focus on preventing delays and the dissatisfaction of key clients who could prevent future projects from materialising. We suggest that the combination of this calculated approach to consultation, together with the delegation of public–private partnership contracting to an arm’s-length government agency, is likely to promote a similar depoliticisation of Irish public–private partnerships as has been observed in other countries. We argue that the potentially harmful stakeholder disengagement that this might encourage can be addressed through a concerted set of measures focusing on improved transparency of decision-making, as well as frameworks that mandate client and public consultation
Accountability · Business · General partnership · Government (linguistics · Political science · Private sector · Public relations · Stakeholder · Community Development and Social Impact · Finance · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Public Administration · Public-Private Partnership Projects
Public–private partnerships
Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience
Government–nonprofit partnership
Public and Private Partnerships as Dilemmas between Efficiency and Democratic Accountability
Stakeholder Involvement in the Design of U.S. Voluntary Environmental Programs
Public–Private Partnerships and the Public Accountability Question
The evolution of public–private partnership in Ireland
Using thematic analysis in psychology
The Not So Good, the Bad and the Ugly
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |