Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Stakeholder engagement and the future of Irish public–private partnerships

Datos Bibliográficos

ID9961983
AutoresGail Sheppard (0000-0003-1404-6977, Technological University Dublin, autor de correspondencia), Matthias Beck (0000-0002-5664-2438, University College Cork)
Año2022
Volumen88
Número3
Páginas843-861
Fecha de publicación2022-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Review of Administrative Sciences (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0020-8523 • E-ISSN: 1461-7226
EditorialSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0020852320971692
OpenAlexW3112901426
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas28

Building on recent works that stress the importance of stakeholder engagement in partnerships, we propose a novel benchmarking framework for the evaluation of public–private partnerships. This framework describes mutuality and the preservation of organisational identity as the ideal characteristics of partnerships because they, in turn, encourage stakeholder support for public–private partnerships. Applying this framework to infrastructure public–private partnerships in Ireland, we note that mutual accountability has been weakened following the financial crisis. Meanwhile, consultation with clients such as key public–private partnership stakeholders, which would help articulate organisational identities, remains patchy across the education, justice and health public–private partnership that we investigate. Nonetheless, there are sectoral differences. In education, consultation centres on school principals while ignoring teaching staff and trade unions. In justice, attention is focused primarily on judges. Similarly, in health sector public–private partnerships, there is a strong focus on clinicians. Overall, private sector-driven consultation efforts are primarily pragmatic, with a focus on preventing delays and the dissatisfaction of key clients who could prevent future projects from materialising. We suggest that the combination of this calculated approach to consultation, together with the delegation of public–private partnership contracting to an arm’s-length government agency, is likely to promote a similar depoliticisation of Irish public–private partnerships as has been observed in other countries. We argue that the potentially harmful stakeholder disengagement that this might encourage can be addressed through a concerted set of measures focusing on improved transparency of decision-making, as well as frameworks that mandate client and public consultation

Accountability · Business · General partnership · Government (linguistics · Political science · Private sector · Public relations · Stakeholder · Community Development and Social Impact · Finance · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Public Administration · Public-Private Partnership Projects

  • Co-creating sustainable innovations in Irish social housing through participatory research

    Open Access•Tracy Mae Ildefonso, Valesca Lima et al.•Sustainable Futures•2026

  • Public–private partnerships

    Open Access•Derick W Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M Brinkerhoff•Public Administration and…•2011

  • Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience

    Ronald K Mitchell, Bradley R Agle et al.•Academy of Management Review•1997

  • Government–nonprofit partnership

    Open Access•Jennifer M Brinkerhoff•Public Administration and…•2002

  • Public and Private Partnerships as Dilemmas between Efficiency and Democratic Accountability

    Ulrika Mörth•Journal of European Integration•2007

  • Stakeholder Involvement in the Design of U.S. Voluntary Environmental Programs

    Open Access•Joann Carmin, Nicole Darnall et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2003

  • Public–Private Partnerships and the Public Accountability Question

    Open Access•John Forrer, James Edwin Kee et al.•Public Administration Review•2010

  • The evolution of public–private partnership in Ireland

    Open Access•Gail Sheppard, Matthias Beck•International Review of…•2016

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • The Not So Good, the Bad and the Ugly

    Eoin Reeves•Local Government Studies•2013

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae