Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Coopetition in a merger process

Regulators and management of coopetitive tensions

Bibliographic Data

ID9961997
AuthorsAnne-Sophie Thelisson (0000-0001-8853-440X, Institute of Sustainable Business and Organizations, Sciences and Humanities Confluence Research Center - UCLY, ESDES, France, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume89
Issue2
Pages381-397
Publication date2023-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Review of Administrative Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-8523 • E-ISSN: 1461-7226
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00208523211034667
OpenAlexW3189376150
LanguageEN
References cited48

Coopetitive tensions can arise as strategic decisions are imposed on firms that challenge them to pursue competition and collaboration with other organizations. Regulators—such as the state—can interfere in merger strategies. Using a longitudinal case study, the objective of the study is: (1) to analyze which regulators influence coopetitive tensions in a merger process (including negotiation and integration stages); and (2) to explore how coopetitive tensions are coped with during the process. We found that the state and customers have architectural roles as regulators during the process (negotiation period, deal, and integration process). We explore coopetition paradox management at different levels (interorganizational, organizational, and individual levels) over the merger process

Business · Competition (biology · Coopetition · Economics · Industrial organization · Knowledge management · Management · Market economy · Negotiation · Organizational structure · Political science · Process (computing · Process management · Business Strategy and Innovation · Computer Science · Wine Industry and Tourism

  • Toward a Theory of Paradox

    Wilson K Smith, Wendy K Smith et al.•Academy of Management Review•2011

  • Co-opetition between giants

    Open Access•Devi R Gnyawalị, Byung-Jin Park et al.•Research Policy•2011

  • We're Changing—Or Are We? Untangling the Role of Progressive, Regressive, and Stability Narratives During Strategic Change Implementation

    Scott Sonenshein•Academy of Management Journal•2010

  • Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data

    Ann Langley•Academy of Management Review•1999

  • Oil and state capitalism

    Jonas Meckling, Bo Kong et al.•Review of International Political…•2015

  • Cooperative competition? The ambivalence of coopetition in territorial authorities

    Open Access•Christophe Assens, Annie Bartoli et al.•International Review of…•2019

  • Qualitative Data Analysis

    Open Access•Matthew B Miles, A Michael Huberman•Journal of Environmental Psychology•1994

  • The Iron Cage Revisited

    P Dimaggio, Paul J Dimaggio et al.•American Sociological Review•1983

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae