Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Management Innovation of Quasi-Governmental Agencies in Korea

Bibliographic Data

ID9963518
AuthorsPan Suk Kim (0000-0002-0551-1702, Yonsei University, corresponding author)
Year2003
Volume69
Issue4
Pages535-552
Publication date2003-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Review of Administrative Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-8523 • E-ISSN: 1461-7226
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0020852303694008
OpenAlexW2090279278
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited1

Many quasi-governmental agencies operate under the umbrella of the Korean government. Their semi-official status derives from the receipt of government contributions, commissions or subsidies. There are literally hundreds of such organizations whose sole objective is to operate in support of the Korean people, yet they have a poor public image. They are often portrayed in the media as unaccountable and inefficient. They have been criticized by civil society because many quasi-governmental agencies have operated without comprehensive evaluation and monitoring systems. External criticism of the agencies has manifested itself in a demand for management innovation within these agencies. Indeed, the push for reform has expanded to include the governmental agencies as well as the quasi-governmental agencies overseen by the Korean government. In response to the reform movement, the Ministry of Planning and Budget (MPB) has stated their objective to overhaul the management of quasi-governmental agencies. In reality, however, the Ministry can only make recommendations to the agencies due to a lack of regulatory authority over such agencies. The purpose of this article is to review the overall status of quasi-governmental agencies in Korea and the management challenges they face, to assess similar cases from overseas, and to examine possible measures for more efficient management of these quasi-governmental agencies

Accountability · Business · Christian ministry · Civil society · Criticism · Government (linguistics · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Receipt · Subsidy · Accounting · E-Government and Public Services · Public Administration

  • Does only performance feedback matter in public organizations? Testing the moderating role of directional managerial networking on performance improvement

    Intae Kim, Yeongjun Ko•Public Management Review•2023

  • Understanding diverse types of performance information use

    Yujin Choi, Harin Woo•Public Management Review•2022

  • Emerging Challenges to the Public Capacity in the Era of Evolving Public Administration

    Pan Suk Kim•Asian Journal of Political Science•2007

  • The Politics of Government Reform in Korea

    Open Access•Sauk-Hee Park, Mark Wilding•Administration & Society•2016

  • Public Management Policy and Practice in Western China

    Open Access•Hon S Chan, King W Chow•The American Review of Public…•2007

  • Contextualizing the meaning of public management reforms

    Open Access•Taco Brandsen, Sunhyuk Kim•International Review of…•2010

Citations per year0.32
Citation span2007 - 2023 (17)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae