Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The interaction of pillars in multi‐pillar pension systems

A comparison of Canada, Denmark, Netherlands and Sweden

Bibliographic Data

ID9971234
AuthorsOle Beier Sørensen (OECD France, corresponding author), Assia Billig (OSFI Canada, corresponding author), Marcel Lever (CPB Netherlands, corresponding author), Jean‐Claude Ménard (OSFI Canada, corresponding author), Ole Settergren (Swedish Pensions Agency Sweden, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume69
Issue2
Pages53-84
Publication date2016-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Social Security Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-871X • E-ISSN: 1468-246X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/issr.12101
OpenAlexW2509037380
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited10

Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden have advanced multi‐pillar pension systems. Using micro‐simulations, this article presents a close examination of the interaction of pillars in these countries. The relative importance and the role of the different pension pillars vary from country to country, and according to age, income, gender and socio‐economic dimensions as well as between generations. A further area of investigation is the mitigation capacity of the four pension systems. On the one hand, adverse labour careers lead to lower life‐time earnings and lower private pension accruals. On the other hand, these effects are mitigated through the design of pillars and their interaction. Mitigation is important to income security and stability in retirement and to post‐retirement income distribution. However, mitigation mechanisms come at the cost of incentives. Moreover, in many countries, the generosity of public benefits is set to decrease – increasing the importance of private pensions. This will shift risk and uncertainty from employers and pension institutions to individuals. Thus, risks and uncertainties related to private pensions will become more important, raising questions about the division of responsibilities between public and private pensions, and about the potential of mitigating such risk through pillar interaction. These concerns are further reinforced by labour market changes. Although a pension system free of distortions is inconceivable, this article seeks to contribute to addressing how mitigation should be designed, and how mitigation and risk sharing should be balanced against incentives, challenges which are as much political as technical

Business · Earnings · Economics · Incentive · Labour economics · Market economy · Pension · Pillar · Private pension · Public economics · demographic modeling and climate adaptation · Engineering · Finance · Global Health Care Issues · Retirement, Disability, and Employment

  • Justice Matters. News Framing Effects on Opinions about Pension Reform

    Open Access•Linda van den Heijkant, Martine Van Selm et al.•Work Aging and Retirement•2023

  • The challenge of pension reform in Georgia

    Open Access•Tamila Nutsubidze, Khatuna Nutsubidze•International Social Security…•2017

  • Averting the old age crisis

    World Bank•Averting the old age crisis.•1994

  • Future Social Security Entitlements and the Retirement Decision

    Courtney Coile, Jacob Gruber et al.•The Review of Economics and…•2007

Citations per year0.22
Citation span2017 - 2023 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae