The European Court of Justice and the free movement of patients in the European Union

At present, health policy in the European Union (EU) is being developed in an extremely disconnected fashion. EU member States independently develop their own health systems, based on the goals they wish to pursue, without really considering consistency with European Community (EC) law. The impact of European integration is, in turn, mainly indirect and has emerged from European Court of Justice (ECJ) rulings. These rulings have arisen either from considerations in other sectors or through the process of addressing particular issues within single cases, leaving major issues of applicability unresolved. The evolving issue of free movement of patients is instructive. While not completely outlawing the use of a prior authorization system, recent ECJ rulings have radically restricted member States' discretion to determine their own policies by requiring that their decisions be necessary, proportional and based on objective and non‐discriminatory criteria. By linking EEC Regulation 1408/71, on which cover for healthcare abroad has been traditionally based, with the free provision of services, the ECJ seems to have created difficulties and important uncertainties for the system of coordination of social security schemes

Authorization · Business · Consistency (knowledge bases · Discretion · Economic Justice · Economics · European court of justice · European integration · European union · European Union law · Free movement · International trade · Law and economics · Member state · Member states · Political science · Preliminary ruling · European and International Law Studies · European Law and Migration · Health Services Management and Policy · Law

• Towards an internal health market with the European court

  Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen•West European Politics•2005

  Add to list