Responding to Unilateral Challenges to International Institutions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9977136 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stefanie Walter (0000-0001-8529-4121, University of Zurich), Nicole Plotke-Scherly (University of Zurich) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-8833 • E-ISSN: 1468-2478 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/isq/sqaf022 |
| OpenAlex | W4409025648 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 60 |
s How do international institutions respond to unilateral challenges by its member states, such as non-compliance, blocking of reforms, renegotiation requests, or withdrawal? This paper argues that this response depends on a trade-off between the risks of not accommodating the challenge, which could disrupt cooperation gains, and the risks of accommodating, which may embolden future challengers. International institutions aim to minimize costs, accommodating challenges when cooperation losses are high, and resisting when the risk of contagion is significant. When both risks are large, they face an “accommodation dilemma” and politically charged negotiations with the challenging country. We evaluate this framework with a comparative case study of fourteen referendum-endorsed challenges to international institutions, analyzing cases that varied in cooperation gains at risk and contagion risks. The analysis shows that across a range of different issues and institutions, the framework helps us better understand why member states respond differently to such challenges and why some challenges are resolved easily whereas others become conflictual. By developing a widely applicable theoretical framework and a versatile coding scheme, the paper contributes to a better understanding of how international institutions respond to contestation and the populist and nationalist backlash against global governance
Political science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy
Economic sanctions reconsidered
A Theory of Global Governance
Exit from Hegemony
Politicising Europe
Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration
Europe in Question
International organizations in a new era of populist nationalism
Contested multilateralism
Hello, goodbye
After Hegemony
Cooperation under Anarchy
Renegotiating the World Order
Learning and the diffusion of regime contention in the Arab Spring
Performing Brexit
The instability of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex
Cascading noncompliance
Donald Trump and the survival strategies of international organisations
Referendums on Membership and European Integration 1972–2015
Ruling the World
International organizations' responses to member state contestation
The Brexit deterrent? How member state exit shapes public support for the European Union
Public Support for European Integration
The Effect of Repeated Play on Reputation Building
The Brexit vote
Getting around no
Disintegration and party competition
Referendum challenges to the EU’s policy legitimacy – and how the EU responds
What factors determine bargaining power and success in EU negotiations
Learning from precedent
Why States Act through Formal International Organizations
Brexit
Brexit Dilemmas
Bargaining, Enforcement, and Multilateral Sanctions
Politicizing International Cooperation
Noncooperation by Popular Vote
Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation
The reverberations of British Brexit politics abroad
Explaining Instability in the Stability and Growth Pact
The Punishment Trap
Cross-National Social Influence
Brexit Domino? The Political Contagion Effects of Voter-endorsed Withdrawals from International Institutions
Treaty Compliance and Violation
Contested Sovereignty
Institutional design for a post-liberal order
The path-dependent design of international organizations
When do member state withdrawals lead to the death of international organizations
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |