O’Connell’s liberal rivals in 1843
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9982018 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert D Sloan (Haberdashers (United Kingdom), corresponding author), Robert Sloan |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 117 |
| Pages | 47-65 |
| Publication date | 1996-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Irish Historical Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-1214 • E-ISSN: 2056-4139 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0021121400012578 |
| OpenAlex | W2498742865 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 2 |
In 1843 Daniel O’Connell’s campaign for repeal of the Act of Union won the support of millions of Irish Catholics. This movement, of which the famous ‘monster meetings’ were the most striking feature, greatly alarmed adherents to the union in both Britain and Ireland. This article is concerned with the response of those M.P.s who supported the union but repudiated ‘Protestant ascendancy’ and advocated removal of the grievances of Ireland’s Catholic majority. There were about forty such ‘liberal-unionist’ members then in parliament, their landed influence and popular sympathies having enabled them to emerge relatively unscathed from the Whig electoral disaster of 1841. They were a mixed bag of Protestants and Catholics, Whigs and liberals, and they had as little idea of party unity as the stereotypical independent member of nineteenth-century fame. This picture of unco-ordinated individual activity was to change dramatically in response to the momentous events of what O’Connell called ‘the great Repeal Year’
Economic history · Irish · Liberal Party · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Protestantism · Repeal · Sociology · Historical Studies of British Isles · History · Irish and British Studies · Law · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.09 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2015 - 2015 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |